Quote from DrPepper:
We did address it with our government before they gave the money to AIG. There was a huge public outcry and protests against the $700 million bail-out. Congress pretended to listen by not passing it the first time. Then, when the market tanked, congress added quite a bit more pork to the bill to persuade a few more congressman to vote for it. In the future, all of these bailouts will be looked upon as the biggest financial mistake in history.
We taxpayers had no opportunity to raise hell or protest the AIG bailout. It was not part of the 700B bailout sham. It was originally a 70B loan at 12% or so. Renegotiated to 150B at approx 6% with minimal transparency. We found out only after the deal was done. Now they are claiming its part of national security... WTF
I believe the reason this deal was done fast and without any act of congress was the fact that AIG insures Government and municiple bonds and underwrites risk for a majority of the tanking banks. The original purpose was to provide a 70B bridge loan so they could liquidate their 1 trillion + in assets and windup their business affairs.
Feds defrauded the citizens by stating the deal will make money for all taxpayers. Making money for citizens is not the function nor purpose of our federal government. The government knows the bankruptcy code is a sham only allowing lawyers to rape all the assets. The feds have unilaterally decided who to save and who to let die.
The same Jagaloons who have bankrupted their own company are still in charge with fed guaranteed money. Hmm.. lets let the fox guard the henhouse.
Imagine if white collar crime had the same three strikes your out laws... Be alot of pardon requests on Bush's docket.