AIG eyes action on Goldman over CDOs

Quote from Blotto:

Quite right. Notice how all the firms reporting record profits in Q1 2009 were all AIG counterparties?

Yeah we were saying then it was pass thru from the US to CP's thru AIG when they paid off claims.
 
I find it very ironic that governments around the world attack GS for shorting subprime.

Yes, securitization fuelled an appettite for borrowing, but it didn't create the bubble in the housing market, in the CRE and in personal borrowings.

Governments should have regulated borrowing instead of encouraging it. They should have set a minimum downpayment of 30% for housing purchase for instance.

They encouraged borrowing because everybody should be a home owner for instance.

Prudence was not encouraged by governments. Now, they need someone to blame for their failure and someone to pay for their mistakes.

It now looks like shorting subprime will be recategorized as a crime.

Every action that threatens the unravelling of the card castle will be punished.

This is statism with a big dose of big brother. He who doesn't abide or play the game will be suppressed.
 
Quote from ASusilovic:

AIG, the US government-controlled insurer, is considering pursuing Goldman Sachs over losses incurred on $6bn of insurance deals on mortgage-backed securities similar to the one that led to fraud charges against the US bank.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/db7dc52a-4bee-11df-a217-00144feab49a.html

And will AIG remit that money back to the Taxpayer, who paid those losses?

Or will AIG keep that 6 Billion for itself?

These AIG clowns are looking to cash in off the taxpayers dime. AGAIN. Unbelievable corruption.
 
Quote from Alexandre:

I find it very ironic that governments around the world attack GS for shorting subprime.

Yes, securitization fuelled an appettite for borrowing, but it didn't create the bubble in the housing market, in the CRE and in personal borrowings.

Governments should have regulated borrowing instead of encouraging it. They should have set a minimum downpayment of 30% for housing purchase for instance.

They encouraged borrowing because everybody should be a home owner for instance.

Prudence was not encouraged by governments. Now, they need someone to blame for their failure and someone to pay for their mistakes.

It now looks like shorting subprime will be recategorized as a crime.

Every action that threatens the unravelling of the card castle will be punished.

This is statism with a big dose of big brother. He who doesn't abide or play the game will be suppressed.

wow that is some seriously professional spin control.


How about this.

The Fed is owned by the regional fed banks.
The shareholders of the regional fed banks are bankers.
Those bankers encouraged the Fed to allow lax lending standards during a bubble -- making the bubble 10 times larger than it every should have been.

With the largest profits in earths history because of the incredible amount of lending going on... Wall street was able to buy off the government officials in charge of regulating them.

Just ask Barney Frank's lover at Indymac or ask why Dodd got special loans form Mozillo who was the front for much of those wall street loans.

We need glass steagall and let wall street get back to taking risks with its own money not the taxpayers.
 
Quote from achilles28:

And will AIG remit that money back to the Taxpayer, who paid those losses?

Or will AIG keep that 6 Billion for itself?

These AIG clowns are looking to cash in off the taxpayers dime. AGAIN. Unbelievable corruption.

I didn't wait for our government to repay me. I worked with a firm to recover my stock fraud losses.
 
Back
Top