Ahmadinejad at Columbia - where's the love for the non-moonbat speakers?
- Thread starter hapaboy
- Start date
Just as I thought, you are a little creepy lying weasel who fakes other people quotes. You have no integrity and are not to be taken serioulsy. I will never forget your E=mc(squared) solution to building 7, it was hysterical. P.S I have just been informed that you have a history of weasel lying: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...dio#post1539699
Now take your weasel ass off and bore someone else.
Good. Then you understand that every time I see some CT post, that's what I see.
A few things that make my point :
1-You came in here for pages asking how can 1's debris hit 7, claiming that 7 was 1020 ft away when it's really less than 400 ft. Your "expert" used this distance to prove that his calculations proves that it couldn't happen without explosives being used. Yet when I show you how wrong that distance is and therefore his calculations are all wrong, you don't skip a beat about asking how it could happen, totally ignoring the fact that your "expert's" assertions are all wrong if they were done with inaccurate numbers. None of this matters to you, but since you're a true believer, your belief never changes.
2- But that's not the end of it! You continue claiming that the only way for 7 to fall at near free fall speeds is by the use of explosives to "blow the concrete and steel out of the way" so it could fall like that. But finally, I get you to concede that there are no explosions heard, thereby proving that no explosives were used, and without a pause, your story morphs into that the interior columns were cut with thermate, allowing the fall to proceed as it did, totally ignoring the FACT that you earlier were claiming that only explosives could explain the near free fall speed. Again, you're a true believer. Don't let your past statements get in the way, right?
3- In an earlier thread, after claiming to have read CT debunking threads and knowing both sides of the issue, you claimed that I was a liar when I stated that 7 was still being investigated by NIST. After I showed you proof that you're wrong..... no admission that the CT assertions were a lie when they spread the disinformation that NIST isn't investigationg 7.
You are a moonbat, willing to suspend all critical thinking as long as it agrees with your emotional views of the 9/11 tragedy.
Being a skeptic of any govt story is good, but until you start using some critical thinking skills and truly view both sides, you are nothing but a waste of oxygen......
This is not controlled demolition?
How long can you contine to insult and degrade the 50%+ of americans who do not believe the govt's 'offical' story.
That weakens america . Why don't you respect free speech.
Even the offical WTC report can't explain how wtc 7 collapsed.
How long can you contine to insult and degrade the 50%+ of americans who do not believe the govt's 'offical' story.
That weakens america . Why don't you respect free speech.
Even the offical WTC report can't explain how wtc 7 collapsed.
You psycho, you have just re edited my quote on the same page!! You can't help yourself can you?! There always seemed to be something not quite right with you Haroki, and I think that you are not quite there mentally. Now please don't take offence to this, many good people have been affected by mental illnesses and it's nothing for you to be ashamed of. Under the circumstances I think it would be wrong of me to continue. Goodbye!