Ahmadinejad at Columbia - where's the love for the non-moonbat speakers?
- Thread starter hapaboy
- Start date
Quote from DaveCT:
HAHAHAHAHAHA, Another one of this guys conspiracies!!!!
You mine as well dump your SN and make a new one. You are irrelevant on this board now. No one takes kooks like you seriously lol.
Unlike you, I don't need to use aliases so I won't be taking your advice. Now, I have to give credit where credits due, your stupidity is top notch, but hey little fella, go and show it off to some other ET members, why should I get all the laughs.
Quote from DaveCT:
HAHAHAHA This idiot thinks he's so important that someone here would waste there time to reregister and for what reason?
This thread started on 9/24, I registered on 9/25
This guy has BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome)
Yes you clearly have something important to do instead of dropping your little gems of brainlessness all over this thread. I agree, if the thread started on 9/24 there is no way you could have created an alias on 9/25 would mean you only had 24 hour to do it. Yep you sold me on that one Einstein! Now really, I have hogged too much of your time already, go forward into ET and flex those litterary and intellectual muscles of yours.
who is the crazier, a lunatic or the person who tries to reason with him?
the truth is out there, for anyone with a half a brain, hell 1/4 of a brain, to discover.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
This topic has taken me through all the stages...
Denial (this isn't happening!)
Anger (why is this happening?)
Bargaining (ok, could we both be a bit correct...)
Depression (I don't care anymore)
Acceptance (these lunatics will repeat the same insane illogical arguments for eternity always expecting a different outcome)
http://www.cancersurvivors.org/Coping/end term/stages.htm
the truth is out there, for anyone with a half a brain, hell 1/4 of a brain, to discover.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
This topic has taken me through all the stages...
Denial (this isn't happening!)
Anger (why is this happening?)
Bargaining (ok, could we both be a bit correct...)
Depression (I don't care anymore)
Acceptance (these lunatics will repeat the same insane illogical arguments for eternity always expecting a different outcome)
http://www.cancersurvivors.org/Coping/end term/stages.htm
I hate to be the one to point this out to you, but you appear to not have progressed past your Denial stage. The ideas put forward by were popularmechanic are a joke to anyone who has studied physics to a serious level.
It's a free world, you believe what you want to. That's your business.
I suppose you would ask me for a quote if i told you that the world was round and not flat! In fact, probably you could even dig out a popularmechanics quote that argue that the world is flat.
Many independent physists and engineers have looked at the building 7 collapse. Here are a few:
Heikki Kurttila, (a Finnish Doctor of Engineering) has made detailed calculations about the collapse speed of WTC-7 and so has Kenneth L. Kuttler (Professor of Mathemetics) in his WTC 7: A Short Computation paper in the Journal of 9/11 Studies.
http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/WTC7_collapse_examination.pdf
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/W7Kuttler.pdf
The findings were : "The great speed of the collapse and low value of resistance strongly suggest controlled demolition"
Stephen jones professor of physics and Leslie roberts, a structural engineer on the original world trade centre project analyse the building 7 collapse:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/Roberts_AnnotatedJones-RobertsonTranscript.pdf
Again their findings are controlled demolition of building 7
Steven E. Jones (professor of physics at Brigham Young University) discusses the collapse of building 7.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/...ollapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf
Findings are that NIST report is flawed and don't explain the collapse.