You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ahmadinejad at Columbia - where's the love for the non-moonbat speakers?
- Thread starter hapaboy
- Start date
I can't speak for Haroki, but personally, I quickly tire when moonbats like yourself repeat your litany of theories over and over like a broken record, punctuated by occasional posts claiming Bush and Co. planned and executed 9/11 and the Osama in the videos is a plant because of the beard color, etc.Quote from DrEvil:
What happened to Haroki and his trusty sidekick Hapaboy?
You, I.Q., and the Zzztroll should start your own website where you can indulge in your fantasies with other moonbats and not have to endure rational people opposing your points of view with such innocuous things as, for example, the truth.
Why did not insurance companies sue him then? Do you think they (insurance companies) don't have access to youtube?Quote from DrEvil:
You don't need to be qualified in demolition. Silverstein (the owner of twin towers and building 7) spells it out plain as day.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAgoI948GGI
In a court case this alone would be the nail in the coffin. Absolute irrefutable proof!
"In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7."
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/owners.html
Quote from dddooo:
Why did not insurance companies sue him then? Do you think they (insurance companies) don't have access to youtube?
"In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7."
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/owners.html
He admits in plain english that it was pulled. What more do you need?
Do you think an insurance company would have the balls to defy the government version of events and pursue criminal actions on the basis of a conterolled demolition?
Get real pal.
"Gay rights groups and Democrats overall have been suprisingly quiet overall about his comments, which if anyone else would have made probably would have caused riots."
Where was earth first and the sierra club when saddam set the oil wells on fire?
Maybe he was referring to the "artsy type" gays when he said we don't have homo's like you do.
Where was earth first and the sierra club when saddam set the oil wells on fire?
Maybe he was referring to the "artsy type" gays when he said we don't have homo's like you do.
Quote from hapaboy:
I can't speak for Haroki, but personally, I quickly tire when moonbats like yourself repeat your litany of theories over and over like a broken record, punctuated by occasional posts claiming Bush and Co. planned and executed 9/11 and the Osama in the videos is a plant because of the beard color, etc.
You, I.Q., and the Zzztroll should start your own website where you can indulge in your fantasies with other moonbats and not have to endure rational people opposing your points of view with such innocuous things as, for example, the truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAgoI948GGI
What more do you need?
You don't have an answer to this do you?
Neither did the official findings, that's why building 7 was completely left out of it.
Give it up sheeple.
Quote from Haroki:
Uhhh, you ARE aware that the investigation isn't finished yet, correct?
Therefore, there can be no "official findings" yet.
Capiche?
Really? Wikipedia disagrees with you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Truth_Movement
I quote from within "estimates that only 30% of their questions were answered in the final 9/11 Commission Report, published 22 July 2004"
Quote from DrEvil:
I give you a video footage and you give me a picture that you can barely make out because of smoke ...
OMG, you really just said that I my eyes are lying. Are you for real??
That's a good one!
I can imagine law courts around the world telling the juries not to actually believe their own eye sight when looking at evidence ... their eyes are obviously lying to them!
I have learned a good leason today ... you can't reason with a moron like Haroki so don't waste your time trying.
Good day to you.
Sometimes I just have to shake my head at the hypocrisy.
Look at a video - I see everything
Look at a photo - I see nothing
Please, some consistency in your style of assessing evidence would go a long way to make your words more credible.
In court, the jury actually looks at and thinks about both sides of an argument. You do not.
Look, if you want to make an argument about how you hate Bush, or the Iraq War, or how the Fed is illegal, your points can be easily made on the rational arguments available to you. To put yourself in the CTer camp just gets you relegated to the fringe wacko group and lessens your message.
Quote from DrEvil:
Really? Wikipedia disagrees with you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Truth_Movement
I quote from within "estimates that only 30% of their questions were answered in the final 9/11 Commission Report, published 22 July 2004"
Dolt-
I'm talking about 7 only, since this is the subject of your posts