Ahhh, isn't the P/R forum much better with fewer extremist trolls??

Yeah, Joe hooked him up. Joe always looks out for extreme left wingers. He has a really obvious political bias... A far left winger has to indisputably cross several lines to get banned. Someone with right wing, or especially libertarian views get banned alot easier. There wasn't much of a choice to ban period boy. It would have made them look very, very bad not to do so. He looked out for his left wing commrade however and deleted the thread where gabbriella was getting destroyed... saved him some embarassment.

Quote from PiggyBank:

haha never heard that before.

And tdog you did dodge a bullet, because you got destroyed twice in that (correctly) deleted thread. AND you were trying to rationalize period boys fuckin retardism just because you don't like Lucrum... but I'll leave you alone :D
More...
 
Quote from phenomena:

Yeah, Joe hooked him up. Joe always looks out for extreme left wingers. He has a really obvious political bias... A far left winger has to indisputably cross several lines to get banned. Someone with right wing, or especially libertarian views get banned alot easier. There wasn't much of a choice to ban period boy. It would have made them look very, very bad not to do so. He looked out for his left wing commrade however and deleted the thread where gabbriella was getting destroyed... saved him some embarassment.
More...

That thread should have been deleted though, because it just drew more attention to a completely fucked situation. But ya, tdog caught a break, not like it matters cause getting owned never stops him anyway lol.
 
I enjoy debating them.

I do not want to see anyone banned (who is not dangerous).

For me this is fun. I do find myself being polarized... but I also learn stuff.

I really did not know that some say FDR was commie lover, Lincoln was grubby power thirsty dictator who did not give a shit about slaves or that the neo cons were founded by former commie socialist like the Dad of William Kristol... before reading it here first. Oddly ET was far out in front on those issues and now the main stream media is catching on just like we sometimes see congressman now say the FED is a privately controlled institution. We never saw that until we hammered the point here on ET.

So I say let the commie socialists speak.
 
Of course, that's what I said initially. I'd just preffer that the ones who speak are the ones who will have honest and thoughtful discourse. Not flame, avoid questions, refuse to address key issues, feign a lack of understanding so as to avoid solid points etc. The guy who was banned was one of those, and I applaud it.

If a socialist/commie will actually debate issues, even though the waters will get rough and discussion will get heated from time to time, that can actually be productive.

However, the zzzz's and ......'s and optional's don't serve this purpose or create an ideal enviroment whatsoever. They were all a waste of an orgasm and failures of evolution, the fewer of them the better. That applies to anyone who behaves that way regardless of where they lie on the political spectrum.

Quote from jem:

I enjoy debating them.

I do not want to see anyone banned (who is not dangerous).

For me this is fun. I do find myself being polarized... but I also learn stuff.

I really did not know that some say FDR was commie lover, Lincoln was grubby power thirsty dictator who did not give a shit about slaves or that the neo cons were founded by former commie socialist like the Dad of William Kristol... before reading it here first. Oddly ET was far out in front on those issues and now the main stream media is catching on just like we sometimes see congressman now say the FED is a privately controlled institution. We never saw that until we hammered the point here on ET.

So I say let the commie socialists speak.
More...
 
Quote from PiggyBank:

haha never heard that before.

And tdog you did dodge a bullet, because you got destroyed twice...
More...
You couldn't identify a winning argument in a lineup even if it was wearing rhinestones and a cowboy hat.
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

You couldn't identify a winning argument in a lineup even if it was wearing rhinestones and a cowboy hat.
More...

kay hypocrite. :p keep telling yourself that.

You have an obvious belief that you're intellectually superior to everyone else, but I still can't understand why. You almost never make a logical argument when challenging another post, you just weakly attempt to insult them/ call them racist, and then claim victory. And the only links u ever provide are just opinion pieces from complete garbage like the Huffington post. What is it exactly that u think you know that puts you on another level (in your mind only)? I'm genuinely interested.

YOU ONLY POST SHITTY JOKES LIKE THIS^ If I didn't know better I would think you are a troll. No substance just annoying, worthless trash posts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top