After DACA Comments, Tucker Asks Trump: ‘What Was The Point Of Running For President?’

[Scataphagos]

“The Democrats’ goal is to import more Democratic voters, and by any means necessary”

"...Fox News’ Tucker Carlson went after President Trump Tuesday for appearing to give up on his immigration priorities, prompting Tucker to ask, “what was the point of running for president?”

_________________________________________________________

DACA was one of Odumbo's "end-run of the Constitution and Congress", EOs. It was illegal but not opposed.

DACA rightfully should be repudiated and all who benefited should be SENT HOME!!

If Trump caves on this... shame on him.

 

[UsualName]

I loved watching how Trump will just switch his position based on the last person to speak in real time. It really was like watching a child trying to organize a marching band. You know he’s just going to get ran over, right?

 

[Slartibartfast]

Pity they can't send back Shiteater, he looks like his origins are from Bulgaria or other gimpy part of Eastern Europe.

Usually the late ones in are the most white trash bigoted. I know a super con prick from Dakota, his mom and dad came over from Wales and he acts as if he was instrumental in American history.

 

[Spike Trader]

This is your next assignment , I want you to listen very carefully ,

Yes Sir ,
Will do Sir ,
Very well Sir ,

 

[jem]

Remember when democrats represented workers and not more immigration? Remember when union chiefs tried to increase their members pay by opposing immigration? Its was before the democrats got bought by silicon valley. not long ago. Were they racist bigoted trash?


why does anyone think its good to import potential terrorists? really... how fucked up do you have to be to think that is a good idea? We have terrorists events every few months in the west now.

2nd... how can you be in favor of workers and increasing wages and think bringing in a million people a year is a good thing.

3rd... if you are anti co2 how can you thinking taking a millons of 3rd world carbon footprints and increasing them 10 fold when bringing them to the west is a good thing.

Why are we not just helping people where they live.

Democrats are about cash from bankers and silcon elites and lefty votes from immigrants.
They did not all of sudden become humanitarians and change their voting pattern.

What if we gave them citizenship minus the right to vote because of the way Obama illegally went around the law...Would the democrats be ok with that?

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Remember when democrats represented workers and not more immigration? Remember when union chiefs tried to increase their members pay by opposing immigration? Its was before the democrats got bought by silicon valley. not long ago. Were they racist bigoted trash?


why does anyone think its good to import potential terrorists? really... how fucked up do you have to be to think that is a good idea? We have terrorists events every few months in the west now.

2nd... how can you be in favor of workers and increasing wages and think bringing in a million people a year is a good thing.

3rd... if you are anti co2 how can you thinking taking a millons of 3rd world carbon footprints and increasing them 10 fold when bringing them to the west is a good thing.

Why are we not just helping people where they live.

Democrats are about cash from bankers and silcon elites and lefty votes from immigrants.
They did not all of sudden become humanitarians and change their voting pattern.

What if we gave them citizenship minus the right to vote because of the way Obama illegally went around the law...Would the democrats be ok with that?

If they give legal status to the daca kids, then the daca parents will be included as surely as night follows day. And then the dems will want the chain migration to remain in place too. So you end out legalizing the daca kids and their parents and then they get to be the sponsors for even more. Not very smart. As discussed, it is all about undocumented democrats and bringing more in.

In reality and fairness, if DACA were to be approved in a non-loon manner, there should be a "claw-back" type of provision for future immigration from those countries. In other words, say for example there are 50,000 daca immigrants from country X and they are allowed to stay. Then we notify that country that the normal immigration quota for that country has been five thousand a year for recent years, so the daca kids that we have permanently accepted have pre-used your quota for the next ten years and are netted down from your quota. Plus future illegals coming into the country will net that number down too. So if you are in Mexico hoping to come in legally some day, then you need to start worrying about how many illegals are already coming in this country because they may be taking your slot, instead of the usual "hey man, not my problem" attitude. Not that the illegal would get a lawful slot but they count as a person from that country currently in this country and we are not taking more from that country in any form and they count toward the cap while here in custody or known to be here.

Okay, that was my little fantasy for the day.