https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/...ublicans.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
What's next, rewrite the Constitution and scrap presidential term limits?
What's next, rewrite the Constitution and scrap presidential term limits?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/...ublicans.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
What's next, rewrite the Constitution and scrap presidential term limits?
What does releasing a memo showing the FBI acting reprehensibility have to do with re-writing the Constitution and presidential term limits?
Let me help you with that -- the answer is "Not a damn thing".
Well, you'd have to read the article which explains how this is a partisan hatchet job.
Why are you afraid to see the memo?https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/...ublicans.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
What's next, rewrite the Constitution and scrap presidential term limits?
Yeah, yeah whatever --- it's always a partisan hachet job when your party is caught doing something shady and illegal.
Why are you afraid to see the memo?People familiar with the underlying application have portrayed the Republican memo as misleading in part because Mr. Steele’s information was insufficient to meet the standard for a FISA warrant. They said the application drew on other intelligence material that the Republican memo selectively omits. That other information remains highly sensitive, and releasing it would risk burning other sources and methods of intelligence-gathering about Russia.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0fb150-0535-11e8-b48c-b07fea957bd5_story.html
The vote, which proceeded along party lines in the Republican-controlled committee, now means that President Trump will have up to five days to review the material and decide whether to keep it secret. If he does nothing, the committee can release the memo publicly. The committee also voted along party lines against releasing a rebuttal memo from Democrats, who denounced both moves upon leaving the closed-door hearing.
People familiar with the underlying application have portrayed the Republican memo as misleading in part because Mr. Steele’s information was insufficient to meet the standard for a FISA warrant. They said the application drew on other intelligence material that the Republican memo selectively omits. That other information remains highly sensitive, and releasing it would risk burning other sources and methods of intelligence-gathering about Russia.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0fb150-0535-11e8-b48c-b07fea957bd5_story.html
The vote, which proceeded along party lines in the Republican-controlled committee, now means that President Trump will have up to five days to review the material and decide whether to keep it secret. If he does nothing, the committee can release the memo publicly. The committee also voted along party lines against releasing a rebuttal memo from Democrats, who denounced both moves upon leaving the closed-door hearing.
Guess you are against transparency in government.
I expect that all we will see when the memo is released is details of the FBI acting unprofessionally -- and taking the Democratic side in a political struggle. We will see nothing that is highly sensitive or risk burning other sources -- all of this hype from Democrats will boil down to nothing except them trying to cover the wrong-doings of their supporters.
So much for Democrats spreading sunshine on government practices.
I'm against tarnishing ongoing investigations using half truths yes.