Let say i have a strategy and i made 1000 trades from this strategy. Assuming i have 600 winners and 400 losers.
Can we blame my losers on randomness? If that's the case, my winners could be due to randomness too isn't?
Randomness is a tricky thing, depending on the context. Consider this: if you flip a fair coin 1000 times, and end up with 600 heads and 400 tails, that would constitute a 6-sigma event. The probability of this distribution to occur is approximately 1 in 500 million, which is a near impossibility.
From these perfectly valid coin-flipping statistics, one may me tempted to make a deduction that if one has a trading system that makes 600 winners out of 1000 trades in a historical backtest, then it must be some kind of "Holy Grail" system, due to its unique ability to make nearly impossible odds. This deduction would be wrong (and dangerous to one's financial health). The reasons revolve around various sorts of selection biases , which are easy to underestimate and difficult to overcome.
Last edited: