Old, but some of us might remember it. Just tragic.
http://articles.latimes.com/1995-09-18/news/mn-47297_1_dead-end-street
http://articles.latimes.com/1995-09-18/news/mn-47297_1_dead-end-street
African Migrants Pick Wrong Journalist To Attack In Notorious Rome No Go Zone
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
Absolute example of a no-go zone there and the deaths of those people are the fault of poor policing and political correctness. The police are not allowed to act as though there are any criminals there because that would be seen as saying that all Latinos are criminals. Nevermind that the point might be that there hundreds of thousands of decent lations who are trying to live a decent life in that area without those scumbags. That is the point for christssake. Note that even the victims are reported as living "nearby" in that article. You wanna do something to help the latino community then take those mothers ou
Think there are no solutions? Think again.
Get several unmarked cars, and patrol those areas consistently with armed undercover police armed to the hilt but decoyed up to look like innocent young or old gringos. So if they are stopped at a stoplight or turn into a known dangerous street and they are confronted by armed bad hombres, then they return fired and kill everyone of those motherfuckers. When I say "kill" I mean like they are dead and gone forever. Just thought I would clarify for the libs. Sure it is dangerous for the cops. How the fuck do you think it is for the citizenry? Have the National Guard patrol too if needed. Ditto for Chicago.
They should fear for their fucking sorry arse life everytime they approach a car full of elderly women that they could very well be members of the swat team in disguise with fully automatic weapons- that's right, you heard me- fully automatic. This bullshit where the government does nothing in your neighborhood but also actively works to make sure that you are not able to arm yourself has to end. Do your goddam job.
Let me know where I am going wrong here.
Last edited:
This is such an obvious answer that you have to wonder why it isn't done. Of course, we know why. The scumbag politicians and the police chiefs they appoint are not interested in stopping this kind of thing. They are not about to go after their own voter base. Plus, they think as white people, we deserve it.
Sounds good but what would happen here is the whites would be prosecuted and sent to prison for long terms as a warning to others not to fight back. Who was arrested in Charlottesville? The people who were attacked by the antifa mobs, who were them pictured as innocent victims by the media and corrupt local government.
As an aside, this is why it was necessary back in the post-Civil War period of anarchy to form the KKK. If you want to see what happens when they take over, look at South Africa today.
Awwww crybully Nazi is at it again.
You know who else was "antifa"? The Allies in WWII.
You think you have it tough now? Not fooled by 'peaceful' vegetarian freaks anymore.
Best buddy of democrats Louie Farrakhan trashes Jews and democrats absolutely, positively refuse to denounce him. He's actually one of their best friends.
The Four Democrats Who Met With Farrakhan And Still Won’t Denounce Him [VIDEO]
http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/10/democrats-denounce-louis-farrakhan/
Democrats calling republicans nazis. LMAO
I found a picture of one of their projection machines.
What phony excuse will these lying scumbags come up with next to beat people up after the crook they supported lost the election?
They're losers, liars, and filth that should get the treefrogtrader treatment.
Last edited:
Stop staying stupid shit.
Again with the "you think" attached to something pulled from your ass.
Antifa exists because fascism exists. Some/many Antifascist are none too bright youth fringe however... look at what is wearing neo-Nazi garb.
The Charlotte Nazis would have been killed had they dared to show their faces like that in say 1948. Only that nobody dreamed that anyone would dare wear Nazi garb in the US, they would have certainly been proscribed..
Remove the sometimes irritating antifascists and you give legitimacy and a clean field to the Nazis, who would be rightfully dead in short order but for the passage of time.
Last edited:
It is time for a lesson in American history. A huge majority of the U.S. soldiers after WW2 viewed the Soviet Union and communists on the left as a worse threat to America than the Nazis.
The veterans of WW2 strongly supported a crackdown on leftists and communists by U.S. Senator Joe McCarthy who was widely viewed as a hero for his efforts to purge Hollywood, the State Department and America of leftists who supported Communism or Socialism. General Dwight Eisenhower ran for President (and won) on a platform of supporting what McCarthy was doing.
The American Nazi party in America during the 1950s and 1960s was led by former U.S. Navy Commander George Lincoln Rockwell. Large Nazi rallies were held in the early 1960s in D.C., New York and other cities which were noted for violent clashes with the Communist Workers Party supporters plus peaceful protests by Jewish war veterans and Holocaust survivors.
Throughout America during the 1950s 1960s, and 1970s there were open rallies where those supporting Nazis clashed with Communists (calling themselves "Anti-Facists"). The veterans of WW2, the media, and the voters all supported the violent put-down of these red Anti-Facists. The most famous event (at least in NC) was the Communist Workers Party march which led to the deaths of 5 people in 1979 in Greensboro, N.C. -- at that time all the politicians in North Carolina got on TV and stated these anti-facist Communists got what was coming to them. The Nazi shooters were all acquitted in their trial.
You are a fucking retard
I'm sick of your mindless babble.Seriously you have such consistency in the art of Dunning-Kruger-Fu that comedy writers should record your every move for a fresh material on a Seinfield type character.
Witless dope.
You are a fucking retard
Seriously you have such consistency in the art of Dunning-Kruger-Fu that comedy writers should record your every move for a fresh material on a Seinfield type character.
Witless dope.
So which part of the history summary are you disputing?