Brooks biggest mistake, in my view, is not laying enough importance, to the definition of trend and its development: trends do not develop; they weaken and gradually very gradually turn into a trading range before turning into a bear.
unless you can identify, the various stages, in the gradual weakening, of the trend, and this is, not easy to do, do NOT attempt to trade.
Not, as in, N-O-T.
i have been studying books since 1987 and i started with Pring, Bollinger, Edwards and Maggee, Bulkowski, baby pips, stock charts, Linda Raschke, and a whole lot of less famous other names that i have forgotten.
NOT A SINGLE ONE, HAS STRESSED THE IMPORTANCE OF TREND DELOPMENT -NOT A SINGLE ONE, EVEN IN ET-AND IT IS THE SINGLE, MOST CRITICAL, FACTOR IN THE SUCCESS, OR FAILURE, OF A TRADER, or even, an investor.
entering, at the end of a trend, is disaster, for every type of market participant.
To say risk management, is the most important thing, is absolute bull shit because risk reward, depends on trend development.
as also does probability.
RR and probability alone, make no sense, without trend development.
i have been the only one, in the whole Fianacial world, that held the opinion that Risk management, is not, the most critical thing, in trading.
this is the single reason, 95 % of traders, lose.
it is the one critical thing that they have NOT been taught.
Should have just learned Elliot wave.