I just went through the Level 2 curriculum, so let me add a couple of cents here. I would guess that the CFA could only help and not hurt. Part of Level 2 is about getting a clear picture of a company's balance sheet, dealing with off-balance-sheet financing and determining earnings quality. Why would you not want to have those tools in your toolbox?
There are no shortcuts in this game. It's ultra-competitive. If you can understand both fundamental and technical analysis, you will have an edge over those traders that only understand one. Have you heard the saying "in the short term the market is like a voting machine, but in the long term it is a weighing machine"? Why not trade those stocks where both the fundamentals and technicals are in your favor?
I am not a fundamental trader, but I can still think of two trades in the past few years that I might have done differently with the CFA behind me. One involved a company playing games with its rebate programs. Another involved understanding synthetic positions using options.
The CFA is hard, so don't feel ashamed if you have to take an exam again. I've met people on their fourth attempt at Level 1, and I most certainly will have to repeat Level 2. But there is more to the CFA than just the curriculum: things like self-study, discipline, and wherewithal are needed no matter what trading style you adopt.
Good luck with your decision.
-lf
thanks man. Well again this is one of the reasons why I want to get the CFA. As a trader that wants to run a global macro hedge fund one day/become a PM, I feel like fundamental analysis will be a great addition to my toolbox.
However I was talking with a CFA charterholder and he says that he didn't learn much that he can apply in the real world.
His quote,"
Again it depends on what type of âanalystâ
Credit risk - not really covered in the CFA CBOK
Capital Adequacy - not covered
Interest rate - not really covered in the CBOK
Stock analysis - maybe but no real deepth in forecasting and management analysis beyond some fundmental formulas and B/S and I/S adjustments to move from GAAP to IFRS - not really hot sell side report items.
Portfolio manager - no real coverage of optimization tools
Corporate Financial Analyst - maybe but not enough accounting or Excel or Business Intelligence tools or analytics
Structured Instruments - not really covered in the CBOK
Personal Financial Advisor (not really an analyst role) - not covered anywhere near as much as the CFP
Economics - not really covered as maths would have to be pounded a lot more along with statistical forecasting
Financal Risk - VaR is mentioned some but not really covered that well
Derivatives Trader - not even close
Ethics - ok - Iâll give you ethcis"
It seems more like a certificate for a generalist. Although still the gold standard in this industry....I want to learn what guys like Jim Chanos or Kyle Bass are looking at.