Quote from peilthetraveler:
I always thought the rules of engagement was not to fire unless you are fired upon.
And I also thought that in war you are not supposed to attack medivacs that take the wounded out of harms way?
I wonder what would happen if a police man walked into a really bad neighborhood in the US and started shooting every guy that peaked his head around a corner. I wonder if THAT would be ok.
These murderers...I mean soldiers...know what they are doing is wrong. Why do you think so many of them have post traumatic stress when they get back? They know they murdered innocent people for fun and they pay the price with their guilt when they get back.
To the guy that said "its kill or be killed" No..its not. They had another choice. They could've flown away and no danger anymore. They chose to fly around waiting anxiously for permission to murder.
Quote from CaptainObvious:
It is this type pacifist approach to war that get's our own guys killed. Don't fire unless fired upon first? How nice for the enemy! They get to shoot at me, I must hope they miss, and then they're gone, off to take another pot shot down the road.
Comparing men in combat to a police officer is absurd, and again, because we have reduced our military force to being cops on the beat, people die needlessly. They ain't cops!
Kill or be killed, no it's not? Sorry, yes it is! Their job is to kill enemy before getting killed themselves. When in a hostile environment, you get the drop the the bad guys and kill them.
Here's the problem. Our enemies do not burden themselves with trying to find morality in war, and we do. There is no morality! War is brutal in a way that most cannot understand. There is no nice way to kill people, which why my stance is military troops should not be sent in to combat until all means of peaceful negotation have been exhausted. Further, once those means have been exhausted, we must then evaluate the actual threat to our nation. If that threat is determined to be grave and imminent...unleash hell, and brother, hell is what it is. Before you judge me, or they guys in this video, as the saying goes, walk a mile in my shoes.
Quote from Free Thinker:
what threat? the guys were reporters carrying cameras.
Ronald Reagan: "retaliation in which innocent civilians are killed is 'itself a terrorist act.'"
Quote from CaptainObvious:
Well wiz kid, the threat was the other guys with weapons, or what could easily be mistaken as weapons considering it's a f'n combat zone. And, as I wrote in the other thread refering to this topic, if you're gonna' film combat you might get shot yourself. It goes with the job. Finally, fuck ronnie rayguns, he was an asshole cowboy for which I had no use.
Quote from Ricter:
The killing has to be done in some circumstances. But what's sickening about this event is that the soldiers appear to relish the killing. I believe that's a function of the cowardly way war is increasing waged, ie. at longer distances, with greater detachment, and with push-buttons. It's more game-like every year.
Quote from Free Thinker:
what other guys with weapons. there were no shots fired. after we gunned down the innocent reporters we also destroyed a family who stopped and tried to offer assistance. did you even watch the video before you ran your mouth?