What happens when a global warming alarmist runs amok on Wikipedia?
William Connolley – Climate Alarmist Thoughtcop
http://climatesanity.wordpress.com/2009/12/20/william-connelley-thoughtcop/
In George Orwell’s 1984 Winston Smith and thousands of co-workers diligently work to re-write history. It has been clear to many that much the same thing has been going on over at Wikipedia. It turns out that one of the champions of the historical rewrite is a fellow by the name of William Connolley, who has taken it upon himself to re-write the thermal history of the planet at Wikipedia to juice-up global warming fears.
Lawrence Solomon, from Canada’s National Post explains…
Connolley took control of all things climate in the most used information source the world has ever known – Wikipedia. Starting in February 2003, just when opposition to the claims of the band members were beginning to gel, Connolley set to work on the Wikipedia site. He rewrote Wikipedia’s articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect, on the instrumental temperature record, on the urban heat island, on climate models, on global cooling. On Feb. 14, he began to erase the Little Ice Age; on Aug.11, the Medieval Warm Period.
But re-writing natural history was not enough for Connolley. He moved on to recreating the personal histories of prominent global warming skeptics…
In October, he turned his attention to the hockey stick graph. He rewrote articles on the politics of global warming and on the scientists who were skeptical of the band. Richard Lindzen and Fred Singer, two of the world’s most distinguished climate scientists, were among his early targets, followed by others that the band especially hated, such as Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, authorities on the Medieval Warm Period.
This wasn’t just a hobby for Mr. Connelley, it must have been his full-time obsession. He re-wrote over 5,000 Wikipedia articles!
But can’t anybody re-write articles at Wikipedia? You can’t hold it against Connolley that he was very passionate and prolific about the subject, can you?
It seems Mr. Connolley had a little more control at Wikipedia than you or I have. Solomon again elaborates..,
His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity. When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it — more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand. When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making, he often had them barred — over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions.
The efforts of people like William Connolley, Michael Mann, the folks at CRU and the rest of the rabid hockey stick team have paid off in spades for the global warming alarmists. I know intelligent, educated, scientists who actually believe that the medieval warm period is the creation of revisionist history of global warming “deniers.” They don’t understand that before the global warming controversy started heating up (pun intended) in the 1990′s the medieval warm period and the little ice age were standard fare for anybody studying the thermal history of the Holocene. It has been the alarmists, like William Connelley, who have tried to “get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”
Connolly’s Biography on Wikipedia
Connolly has his own biography on Wikipedia. At this moment (December 20th, 2009, 6:10 pm Mountain Time) the article says this about his “Wikipedia activity”…
A July 2006 article in The New Yorker reported that Connolley briefly became “a victim of an edit war over the entry on global warming”, in which a skeptic repeatedly “watered down” the article’s explanation of the greenhouse effect.[10] The skeptic later brought the case before Wikipedia’s arbitration committee, claiming that Connolley was pushing his own point of view in the article by removing material with opposing viewpoints. The arbitration committee imposed a “humiliating one-revert-a-day” editing restriction on Connolley. Wikipedia “gives no privilege to those who know what they’re talking about”, Connolley told The New Yorker.[10] The restriction was later revoked, and Connolley went on to serve as a Wikipedia administrator from January 2006 until 13 September 2009.[10]
(More at above url)
William Connolley – Climate Alarmist Thoughtcop
http://climatesanity.wordpress.com/2009/12/20/william-connelley-thoughtcop/
In George Orwell’s 1984 Winston Smith and thousands of co-workers diligently work to re-write history. It has been clear to many that much the same thing has been going on over at Wikipedia. It turns out that one of the champions of the historical rewrite is a fellow by the name of William Connolley, who has taken it upon himself to re-write the thermal history of the planet at Wikipedia to juice-up global warming fears.
Lawrence Solomon, from Canada’s National Post explains…
Connolley took control of all things climate in the most used information source the world has ever known – Wikipedia. Starting in February 2003, just when opposition to the claims of the band members were beginning to gel, Connolley set to work on the Wikipedia site. He rewrote Wikipedia’s articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect, on the instrumental temperature record, on the urban heat island, on climate models, on global cooling. On Feb. 14, he began to erase the Little Ice Age; on Aug.11, the Medieval Warm Period.
But re-writing natural history was not enough for Connolley. He moved on to recreating the personal histories of prominent global warming skeptics…
In October, he turned his attention to the hockey stick graph. He rewrote articles on the politics of global warming and on the scientists who were skeptical of the band. Richard Lindzen and Fred Singer, two of the world’s most distinguished climate scientists, were among his early targets, followed by others that the band especially hated, such as Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, authorities on the Medieval Warm Period.
This wasn’t just a hobby for Mr. Connelley, it must have been his full-time obsession. He re-wrote over 5,000 Wikipedia articles!
But can’t anybody re-write articles at Wikipedia? You can’t hold it against Connolley that he was very passionate and prolific about the subject, can you?
It seems Mr. Connolley had a little more control at Wikipedia than you or I have. Solomon again elaborates..,
His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity. When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it — more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand. When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making, he often had them barred — over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions.
The efforts of people like William Connolley, Michael Mann, the folks at CRU and the rest of the rabid hockey stick team have paid off in spades for the global warming alarmists. I know intelligent, educated, scientists who actually believe that the medieval warm period is the creation of revisionist history of global warming “deniers.” They don’t understand that before the global warming controversy started heating up (pun intended) in the 1990′s the medieval warm period and the little ice age were standard fare for anybody studying the thermal history of the Holocene. It has been the alarmists, like William Connelley, who have tried to “get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”
Connolly’s Biography on Wikipedia
Connolly has his own biography on Wikipedia. At this moment (December 20th, 2009, 6:10 pm Mountain Time) the article says this about his “Wikipedia activity”…
A July 2006 article in The New Yorker reported that Connolley briefly became “a victim of an edit war over the entry on global warming”, in which a skeptic repeatedly “watered down” the article’s explanation of the greenhouse effect.[10] The skeptic later brought the case before Wikipedia’s arbitration committee, claiming that Connolley was pushing his own point of view in the article by removing material with opposing viewpoints. The arbitration committee imposed a “humiliating one-revert-a-day” editing restriction on Connolley. Wikipedia “gives no privilege to those who know what they’re talking about”, Connolley told The New Yorker.[10] The restriction was later revoked, and Connolley went on to serve as a Wikipedia administrator from January 2006 until 13 September 2009.[10]
(More at above url)
