There were several post referring to mine about risk-return of trend following and daytrading strategies. I actually didn't get the point of the critical voices to be honest. But I would like to make my point clearer.
I've been trading trend following and short term strategies and saw quite some other people doing it. Looking at long term track records of pure trend following CTAs I feel that you usually come near to the 1:1 figure of return and draw down. I am talking about net of fees and not multisystem. This 1:1 is a conservative figure, but a "rule of thumb", as asked for by the initial poster, should contain a cussion IMHO. When I refer to trend following I am talking about system with 1.000 roundturns per million dollar per year.
In short term trading (but futures only), I think you can do "much better" than this. Trading about USDm 30 in such thing we came to figures of about 3:1. All calculated for clients, meaning net of management and incentive fee. (Sorry if this was the issue - I am most of the time thinking in "net of fees"). These short term strategies required about 8.000 roundturns per million dollar per year.
The problem with short term is the cost of maintaining the operation (commission, trading desk etc) in time of non-performance.
WDGann
sounds like you are doing far better than me. What are your figures (please include if net or gross)? With how much money (which is a critical issue)? Would you mind giving some idea of what direction you are thinking of when you say "real research"? I am honest in this: if "real research" means better results than I am eager to learn about it.
If you think I am talking about 2n or 3rd hand information, please provide 1st hand.
I do not want to argue. I think I was not too clear in my post, which induced some misunderstanding. I assume we are not talking about the same industry segment, I referred to trend following in futures on a pure quantitative approach.
peace
I've been trading trend following and short term strategies and saw quite some other people doing it. Looking at long term track records of pure trend following CTAs I feel that you usually come near to the 1:1 figure of return and draw down. I am talking about net of fees and not multisystem. This 1:1 is a conservative figure, but a "rule of thumb", as asked for by the initial poster, should contain a cussion IMHO. When I refer to trend following I am talking about system with 1.000 roundturns per million dollar per year.
In short term trading (but futures only), I think you can do "much better" than this. Trading about USDm 30 in such thing we came to figures of about 3:1. All calculated for clients, meaning net of management and incentive fee. (Sorry if this was the issue - I am most of the time thinking in "net of fees"). These short term strategies required about 8.000 roundturns per million dollar per year.
The problem with short term is the cost of maintaining the operation (commission, trading desk etc) in time of non-performance.
WDGann
sounds like you are doing far better than me. What are your figures (please include if net or gross)? With how much money (which is a critical issue)? Would you mind giving some idea of what direction you are thinking of when you say "real research"? I am honest in this: if "real research" means better results than I am eager to learn about it.
If you think I am talking about 2n or 3rd hand information, please provide 1st hand.
I do not want to argue. I think I was not too clear in my post, which induced some misunderstanding. I assume we are not talking about the same industry segment, I referred to trend following in futures on a pure quantitative approach.
peace