There are plenty of children born, as you disturbingly term it, "not viable" but receive health care.
As I said I am by no means a crusader but if an abortion is botched, and the child can live with medical assistance rather than being left for dead then they should receive medical assistance.
For Obama to vote against the assistance removes any doubt it my mind about voting for him. I probably wouldn't have anyways because he refuses to answer a question directly but I'm by no means have I been sold on Mccain.
It really just makes me think Obama is one sick fuck and I'm sure I'm not going to be the only one. It will tip people on the fence.
That's not even a question of a right to choose, that's just plain evil.
As I said I am by no means a crusader but if an abortion is botched, and the child can live with medical assistance rather than being left for dead then they should receive medical assistance.
For Obama to vote against the assistance removes any doubt it my mind about voting for him. I probably wouldn't have anyways because he refuses to answer a question directly but I'm by no means have I been sold on Mccain.
It really just makes me think Obama is one sick fuck and I'm sure I'm not going to be the only one. It will tip people on the fence.
That's not even a question of a right to choose, that's just plain evil.
Quote from bigdavediode:
If the baby died then it presumably was not viable.
No viable child is denied healthcare.
Well, perhaps, but I doubt it. People are pretty absolute in their beliefs on this issue one way or the other.
Like I said, these made up issues to address .00000001% of the population 30 years after something happen detract from real debate.