While I don't support the consumption tax, your concern regarding higher priced items is slightly irrelevant because every man, woman, and child would receive a monthly prebate in order to help cover living expenses up to the poverty level. Yes, even the wealthy would receive monthly disbursements. Because the embedded income tax would disappear from each good and service, prices wouldn't increase by much.Quote from dandxg:
I am not going to read this whole thread because it's been covered so many times. Has anyone considered that approx. 70% of the GDP is based on consumer spending? When you go to a consumption tax what do you think is going to immediately happen? Ppl are going to freak out at what things cost. This will cause a short term recession.
When you visit a foreign country you consider your purchases harder when VAT is approx. 19%, roughly double the US sales tax. I am actually for a consumption tax, a flat tax, but don't think the lobbying forces for CPA and tax related ppl. are just going to sit back and support that. There is a lot of money made of the current dysfunctional system.
People don't change until they feel enough pain. It's human nature. There isn't enough pain to motivate change, yet, maybe in a couple of years.
Post Edit: How will do with online sales loopholes? Many skate that tax all the time. Few states are closing it yet.
Unfortunately, it sounds too good to be true. Say you earn $2 million a year. You can live pretty well spending $1 million, and as a result pay a mere 11 percent of that year's income in taxes. If the very rich pay less, that means more of the total tax burden in any year has to fall on somebody else, most likely the middle class. Reasonable people can disagree about whether this really matters -- over time, a consumption tax only appears more progressive because the rich savers or their descendants eventually spend the money and get taxed.