Quote from Bitstream:
on a few points your post is flat out opposite to actual reality...and in a most orwellian way.
fact is it's made clear you see nothing wrong with the most pervasive and devious form of usury...what's not clear is the extent of your tolerance. so i am curious to know if you think only the money changers should have carte blanche as own earned right to scam people or do you condone any other form of usury no matter who engages in it?
thx
"If the American people ever allow the banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation, and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property, until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power of money should be taken from banks and restored to Congress and the people to whom it belongs. I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money, are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies." ~ Thomas Jefferson
I reread your post and I agree with you to a certain extent. I actually think it's a very dysfunctional relationship. It's like looking at a family where the husband is a control freak and takes advantage of the wife who gives into everything he says. Who is more right? wrong? Well, they both are in their own way.
But when you say 'usury', you remind me of practices a hundred or more years ago and modern day America is nothing like that. Any of these individuals could rent a nice house and save up for a deposit just like the rest of us. They are not being forced to live in a slum and pay interest on their food and utilities. So I'm sorry, but I think you're going too far with the 'usury' comparison...
