No mate I only sell Options on high IV Stocks, they are usually at around the IV LvL that the AXSM is right about nowIld look at high vol stocks vs low vol stocks to see if they make some sort of an adjustment.
No mate I only sell Options on high IV Stocks, they are usually at around the IV LvL that the AXSM is right about nowIld look at high vol stocks vs low vol stocks to see if they make some sort of an adjustment.
I've been trading Options again and I'm getting unreal Delta to OTM Probability Ratios.
Call Side 0.3 Delta =0.85% OTM Probability
Put Side 0.3 Delta =0.55% OTM Probability
Both Sides had the same Implied Volatility.
How is this even possible? Is it because one Side gets purchased more? Shouldn't there be a Scew in IV too?
If this persists, Delta is useless to use in Backtesting.
EDIT: Ticker was AXSM
![]()
Dude, c'mon. Price the synthetic. And we have a file host here on ET. It's 2020.
The delta/ probabilty correlation is just that. A handy approximation. Certainly not accurate enough for back testing. I can't imagine anyone who is trading professionally use those percentages.
Can you elaborate on that? Call and Put ATM Prices are the same, how am I supposed to come to the scew if I price a synthetic Call/Put?
Who?edeltapro.com only uses Delta for it's backtesting
Who?
LOL. I worked in the SPX. I'm sure there are some people who know more about options on here, but not many. I told you pros don't use those calculations and you through up some BS website and pretend it means something. Best of luck.nvm be on your way