---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Quote from PiggyBank:
me either, i am just trying to see if she likes to argue, or if she is actually warped enough that she would convict this guy, based on essentially nothing but her feelings. I mean i could understand it if trayvon was relative of hers but for someone you don't even know.. that's fucking retarded, and scary.
Quote from TGregg:
You presume too much. Riots are a political weapon of the libtards.
Quote from trendlover:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) I show you facts. 2) My feelings is what if that is YOUR brother?
You ask me before if I convict George of murder. I really do not know the law. What I find is 2nd degree murder in the (Florida) is not premeditated. The murder is from depraved mind. So I am really not sure if George is depraved mind. I do not think George is racist. What I think is George know black boys do crime before in the community. George live there too. He KNOW is latino, white and black people live in that community. That community is latino, white and black. George judge guilty in his (imagination) to Trayvon. George to the dispatcher say "These assholes always get away" "Fucking punks"
I think George can not be judge of people walking home. What is wrong with him to judge guilty? George never see crime. He keep following that boy. Trayvon know that.
George is wrong. Trayvon is dead. 3) Do YOU think George can just follow and kill people because he (imagine) guilty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Quote from PiggyBank:
1) No, you didn't show me any facts that prove anything, you showed me what you THINK happened (just look at the post im quoting). And other posters including myself, have tried to explain to you that what you think could have happened doesn't matter in court because there is no proof that zimmerman started the fight, that he broke any laws, or that there are any discrepancies outside the realm of reason in his story.
2) I just fucking said, if he was your relative i could understand your emotions, but he isn't. yes if trayvon was my brother, i would convict zimmerman.. and guess which jury i would NEVER be on? lol
3) No he can't just follow and kill people, and there is no proof that's what happened, which is the whole point.
You still didn't answer my question either, so i'll just throw in the towel.
Quote from PiggyBank:
1) No, you didn't show me any facts that prove anything, you showed me what you THINK happened (just look at the post im quoting). And other posters including myself, have tried to explain to you that what you think could have happened doesn't matter in court because there is no proof that zimmerman started the fight, that he broke any laws, or that there are any discrepancies outside the realm of reason in his story.
2) I just fucking said, if he was your relative i could understand your emotions, but he isn't. yes if trayvon was my brother, i would convict zimmerman.. and guess which jury i would NEVER be on? lol
3) No he can't just follow and kill people, and there is no proof that's what happened, which is the whole point.
You still didn't answer my question either, so i'll just throw in the towel.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------Quote from PiggyBank:
1) No, you didn't show me any facts that prove anything, you showed me what you THINK happened (just look at the post im quoting). And other posters including myself, have tried to explain to you that what you think could have happened doesn't matter in court because there is no proof that zimmerman started the fight, that he broke any laws, or that there are any discrepancies outside the realm of reason in his story.
2) I just fucking said, if he was your relative i could understand your emotions, but he isn't. yes if trayvon was my brother, i would convict zimmerman.. and guess which jury i would NEVER be on? lol
3) No he can't just follow and kill people, and there is no proof that's what happened, which is the whole point.
You still didn't answer my question either, so i'll just throw in the towel.
No matter how much freedom you lose, you'll never riot?Quote from Clubber Lang:
I was thinking the same thing.
Let them riot then pass "American safety law X" which gives the government even more abusive powers and strips away our privacy.
Also gets the parasitic liberals riled up early for the mid term elections.