ABC Makes "Epic Mistake", Retracts Bombshell Flynn Story

[Cuddles]

It's not? When did you change it?

It's not? When did it change?

Never did.

Here let me paint you a picture since you're struggling:

flynn: "Hey boss, the Kremlin's got dirt on Clinton that could help in your campaign."

Trump: " I'm loving it, set up a back channel and get your ass over there, see what they want in return."

Flynn:. "they've also got a troll army that can help deliver our message and Assagne's cooperating since he hates Hill-dawg"

Trump:"MAGA!"

That's clearly collusion since it's undermining the Democratic process with the aid of a foreign government.

Flynn:. "Mr. President elect, the Kremlin's made contact, they want to discuss a joint plan of attack on ISIS."

Trump: "Russia's invaded our allies and they're clearly assisting Assad by indiscriminately bombing rebel forces, this administration has been clear about it's objections. Let's keep the communications open but we better be careful no laws or ally pacts are being broken"

This 2nd example is quite different and not collusion.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Never did.

Here let me paint you a picture since you're struggling:

flynn: "Hey boss, the Kremlin's got dirt on Clinton that could help in your campaign."

Trump: " I'm loving it, set up a back channel and get your ass over there, see what they want in return."

Flynn:. "they've also got a troll army that can help deliver our message and Assagne's cooperating since he hates Hill-dawg"

Trump:"MAGA!"

That's clearly collusion since it's undermining the Democratic process with the aid of a foreign government.

Flynn:. "Mr. President elect, the Kremlin's made contact, they want to discuss a joint plan of attack on ISIS."

Trump: "Russia's invaded our allies and they're clearly assisting Assad by indiscriminately bombing rebel forces, this administration has been clear about it's objections. Let's keep the communications open but we better be careful no laws or ally pacts are being broken"

This 2nd example is quite different and not collusion.

Sure, and here is another example to think about:

"Hey, Hillary. We got a contract going with Podesta and Fusion GPS to find shit on Trump. It was originally started by the republicans but we have taken it over and are into some new phases now. We have a british agent and current or former kgb agent under contract, and they are coming up with some wild stuff to put into a dossier and to use it in the campaign to bring Trump down.

"Yeh, and I know what you are thinking- that's illegal and the government is going to be on our arse right?" No, not at all. In fact the FBI wants more of the action and has agreed to fund future work. They love it. They used the dossier put together by these foreigner types to get FISA warrants on Trumps people - without even investigating or corroborating the allegations in the dossier yourself. You gotta love it Hillary when the FBI just takes material produced by our campaign to get a warrant. It don't get any better than that does it Hillary?"


Which category does that example fall in to?

 

[jem]

let me re write that one.

Obama and Hillary were arming moderate terrorists in Syria.
Those moderate terrorists were sometimes al queda and Isis.
For some reason it looks like the CIA was also helping arm Isis.

so lets go back you your scene.

Trump - can you believe these asshats in the administration and the media are baiting russia after they Obama and Hillary created and armed Isis and al queda there in Syria and Libya.

We don't like assad but at least putin is starting to kill terrorists.
Yeah I know its not in the press but he probably killed some cia operatives who were working with the "moderate" terrorists they were arming. and now the leaders of the cia and other "intelligence leaders" are thirsty for russian blood.

but we can't have them startong a nuclear war because they were arming terrorists.

Our policy is about to change. we won't be arming terrorists. Russia needs to know that we are not going to try pull a charlie wilson on them in syria.

Whatever you can do, just make sure Putin doesn't go nuts over this Obama and his provocations.

Inform them saner heads will be taking over soon.

Tell them we will change policy. Instead of arming terrorist we will work with them in driving terrorists out.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Never did.

Here let me paint you a picture since you're struggling:

flynn: "Hey boss, the Kremlin's got dirt on Clinton that could help in your campaign."

Trump: " I'm loving it, set up a back channel and get your ass over there, see what they want in return."

Flynn:. "they've also got a troll army that can help deliver our message and Assagne's cooperating since he hates Hill-dawg"

Trump:"MAGA!"

That's clearly collusion since it's undermining the Democratic process with the aid of a foreign government.

Flynn:. "Mr. President elect, the Kremlin's made contact, they want to discuss a joint plan of attack on ISIS."

Trump: "Russia's invaded our allies and they're clearly assisting Assad by indiscriminately bombing rebel forces, this administration has been clear about it's objections. Let's keep the communications open but we better be careful no laws or ally pacts are being broken"

This 2nd example is quite different and not collusion.

Here's the issue---both scenarios are perfectly legal.

 

[Cuddles]

Here's the issue---both scenarios are perfectly legal.

I know that's what Fox has been pushing lately but they're wrong.

 

[fhl]

 

[Tom B]

It is only oops when it is done unintentionally.