Abandoned Wal-Mart To Reopen As Shelter For Illegal Immigrants With Tax-Dollar Funding

yeah right, read my post again. When I said that, i was referring to everyone else's comment of deporting illegals without processing as an example of their alternative to an abandon warehouse for housing and processing. You included.

You keep telling everyone "read my post again" but you don't spend any time reading anyone else's.
 
You keep telling everyone "read my post again" but you don't spend any time reading anyone else's.
yes I do read your post. You all attack and don't read mine, that's why you deserve the crown and title, unless you prefer to be called something, i can think of a few...... lol . Let's just keep it as that, you all get it...
 
yes I do read your post. You all attack and don't read mine, that's why you deserve the crown and title, unless you prefer to be called something, i can think of a few...... lol . Let's just keep it as that, you all get it...

Got it. It's everyone else's fault, but not yours.
 
You're like a women making up sh!t. A bank robber is not a fruit picker or a maid. You don't even see the difference do you. FYI there are american bank robber also, did that skip your little brain or lack of. Not even worth explain to you. Please post your trades so we can take the other side. View attachment 170262

Reading comprehension is not your strength. Robbing banks is ILLEGAL. Crossing the border into this country is ILLEGAL. You're trying to tell me these people are ok just because they got a job after they committed a crime. If that's true, then as long as a bank robber gets a job as a fruit picker or maid right after the robbery, we should let him go by your logic.

Here's my trade. Long DIS @ 110 Go ahead and take the opposite end of it.
 
Reading comprehension is not your strength. Robbing banks is ILLEGAL. Crossing the border into this country is ILLEGAL. You're trying to tell me these people are ok just because they got a job after they committed a crime. If that's true, then as long as a bank robber gets a job as a fruit picker or maid right after the robbery, we should let him go by your logic.

Here's my trade. Long DIS @ 110 Go ahead and take the opposite end of it.
I am really liking the style of peilthetraveler. First he roasts you with his debate skills then he even throws in a stock tip right here in P&R at the end with an exact entry price!

Try getting an exact entry price with the resident SJW snowflakes here...wont happen.
 
This is true. But what you conveniently leave out is that leaving an illegal in country illegally after you've caught them is like ticketing the speeder, and then watching as he rockets away at 100 mph and doing nothing about it.

Or perhaps you think we should ignore speeders and let them continue speeding? Remember, this is your comparison here.

nah; it's more like giving a ticker to someone for going 66 on a 60 mph zone and then that person going 66 again.

"Try it yourself" from the image you've posted.

I have. My wife and I did it legally. How about you? If your concern is that the process is too cumbersome and expensive (I would agree with this statement) then use the law to change it. Don't ignore the law as that sets precedent for people to ignore any law they don't like or agree with on any grounds they feel is morally correct or inconvenient.

Point is the process for illegals is leave everything in your life behind (including children born in the country), take a 10 year ban in your country, then you can apply (if you have the fortune of being rich, have family ties, or are exceptionally talented). Not all immigrants have the luck of being born w/family ties to the US or in countries w/small immigration numbers into the US. Not all immigrants are willing to just marry for the convenience of getting a green card and would rather fix their status on merit alone.

As for changing the law (and I agree); yeah, good luck w/that, who's been calling amnesty on anything comprehensive immigration reform related and shooting down every bill? Who wants to end H1B visas (one of the few immigration processes that allow immigrating on merit)? Who wants to end family chain immigration and end birthright citizenship? Who benefits the most on guest worker/seasonal programs? Who pushes for scrapping catch and release and instead favors use of corporate prisons on the taxpayer's dime? Who shot down mandatory e-verify for every employer because "obama"?
 
nah; it's more like giving a ticker to someone for going 66 on a 60 mph zone and then that person going 66 again.

Do explain. How is the illegal who is released still not here illegally and breaking the law? The only way to rectify his/her infraction with the law is to punish, then either deport or legalize. Short of that it's the exact same thing as releasing the speeder and having him speed off.


Point is the process for illegals is leave everything in your life behind (including children born in the country), take a 10 year ban in your country, then you can apply (if you have the fortune of being rich, have family ties, or are exceptionally talented). Not all immigrants have the luck of being born w/family ties to the US or in countries w/small immigration numbers into the US. Not all immigrants are willing to just marry for the convenience of getting a green card and would rather fix their status on merit alone.

Not my problem. I would love to emigrate to Switzerland. If I tried to do it outside the framework, I'd be arrested and deported. I have no more right to willing myself to become Swiss than current illegals here who try to circumvent the system and assume living here.

As for changing the law (and I agree); yeah, good luck w/that, who's been calling amnesty on anything comprehensive immigration reform related and shooting down every bill? Who wants to end H1B visas (one of the few immigration processes that allow immigrating on merit)? Who wants to end family chain immigration and end birthright citizenship? Who benefits the most on guest worker/seasonal programs? Who pushes for scrapping catch and release and instead favors use of corporate prisons on the taxpayer's dime? Who shot down mandatory e-verify for every employer because "obama"?

So we get to ignore every law we want simply because we believe it is too difficult to change it to make it the way we like?
 
Back
Top