AAPL - Analysis - 16 Apr 2019 - SHORT

WADR this is still looking for the free lunch that doesn’t exist

You are basically saying that your analysis of the public information is better than the market’s analysis. Therefore there is a free alpha to be picked up

If you really want to play aapl. Read my post above regarding the past 8 quarters. That’s what profitable trading is like.

No looking for free lunch. But watch what the pro boys are doing. And when they are ready to have a feast dinner, you join the party, by using your intelligence to read their intention.

So based on what you are saying, would it be fair to conclude that when one looks at price history chart of Apple in any time frame, each move is the result of perfect efficiency?

One day I may get around to creating a chart of probabilities based on prior price action, for a specified time frame. I will add a couple of other time frame appropiate variables to it. This chart is much more likely to not look like the chaotic mess that is Apple's.

There are other ways to play Apple's expected long term underperformance. One can go long a more innovative company in the consumer technology industry and shorting Apple, for example.
 
So based on what you are saying, would it be fair to conclude that when one looks at price history chart of Apple in any time frame, each move is the result of perfect efficiency?

One day I may get around to creating a chart of probabilities based on prior price action, for a specified time frame. I will add a couple of other time frame appropiate variables to it. This chart is much more likely to not look like the chaotic mess that is Apple's.

There are other ways to play Apple's expected long term underperformance. One can go long a more innovative company in the consumer technology industry and shorting Apple, for example.

perfect efficiency - no... otherwise we'd be all wasting time here :)

What I am saying is there is no money to be made with the way retail traders think... this is a game where the pros take the retails to the cleaners.. they have everything at disposal.. the media machine, the analysts smoke mirror, the buying power to move price (to certain extent)..

We retail have nothing.

the only way to win, is to figure out how the pros try to take us to the cleaners... their actions leave a trail - the narratives they push, the upgrade/down grade, the price action.

You can't beat them... JOIN them.
 
perfect efficiency - no... otherwise we'd be all wasting time here :)

What I am saying is there is no money to be made with the way retail traders think... this is a game where the pros take the retails to the cleaners.. they have everything at disposal.. the media machine, the analysts smoke mirror, the buying power to move price (to certain extent)..

We retail have nothing.

the only way to win, is to figure out how the pros try to take us to the cleaners... their actions leave a trail - the narratives they push, the upgrade/down grade, the price action.

You can't beat them... JOIN them.

Well said. The big investors and hedge funds create tsunamis with their huge buying or selling power. Have you seen anyone run towards the tsunami and survive? Even the elephants in Thailand, headed for the hills when they sensed the danger of the tsunami. Only fools try to fight the trend. You will never win out because you will be broke long before it turns your direction!
 
Hello All,

I've done a lot of analysis on AAPL, and I'd like to run it past you to see what you think. Thanks in advance, love you all! ~Keith :^)

Summa Summarum:

- I'm short on AAPL, and expect a 10% correction soon.
- Target price $180.
- Analyst rating: SELL

ANALYSIS

1. Service Company. Alarming to me is that AAPL is expanding sideways into other markets. I read this as a tip-off that device growth and innovation has stagnated. They haven't released a new "Apple Teleporter" or some new innovation; they're entering other markets to prop up their growth.

2. Recent (March 25th) announcements. Honestly, this stuff has all been done:
a. Apple TV - Fierce competition, been tried. Meh
b. Apple Arcade - Gaming is great, and money is there, but it's ultimately a vidiot market. Will it include Fortnite? Doubtful. Maybe they'll buy it :^)
c. Apple News - Again, fierce competition, and they have to pay a big chunk of change to the content providers.
d. Apple Magazine - Meh.
e. Apple Card. Bad move, Tim. This is a great way to piss off the financials, and has the potential to cause real problems. I used to work for AT&T; "Ma Bell." They started to expand into other markets. introduced the AT&T Universal Card. When companies don't "Stick to their Knitting" and challenge the financials, it causes problems. They were eventually busted up.

3. Disney's recent announcement to offer a streaming service dropped NFLX about 5%. AAPL's announcement didn't move the needle; it had little, if any, effect. It's basically a non-factor (perhaps non-starter?!)

4. Another GE? Is AAPL now following in the footsteps of GE, where they're starting to sprawl? This is not the AAPL of 2000; they're facing a typical economic cycle now. It happened to US Steel; it's happening to GE... it can happen to AAPL.

5. Tim Cook is an Operations guy. Granted, Jobs is a tough act to follow, but Cook has remarkably little innovation. He spent the first 12 years of his career with IBM. He's not really a visionary; just a typical "Big Blue" kind of thinker. 10 years after Jobs' passing, we're seeing Cook's AAPL... and it hasn't changed much.

6. CHINA. Huawei copied the iPhone design and is selling it. The Chinese Guv'ment is "encouraging" people to buy one of over 100 Chinese-made phones (read: buy an iPhone? You will be executed and your organs harvested and sold).

7. AAPL to Buy Something? There's a real risk that AAPL is about to drop a boatload of ca$h, and buy somebody. This will dramatically affect their valuation.

8. iPhone stagnation. iPhone is about 2/3rds of AAPL revenue, and their sales are stagnating:

aapl_revenue.png


RISKS

1. It's the economy, stupid! The greatest risk I now see is that AAPL is in the DOW, and Trump loves his Dow. It's possible that he will prop it up to keep the "economy" good to improve his re-election prospects.

2. The Dovish Fed. Seems like the Fed is backing off on raising rates. This could trigger a ca$h flow back to equities. On that note, it's a bit depressing that they might have to lower rates; it sends a message that the economy really isn't that great. There's no inflation because peeps aren't spending.

It's also alarming how the 10T is hanging around 2.6%... even with dovish statements. Eek! Shows how investors are holding to the bond market and skittish about going into equities.

kmiklas,

I disagree with shorting APPL now.

Looking at the weekly and daily chart, trend is up. Buy Apple now, with a stop at $192.

If you are going to short, you have to wait to price get to up there again, then short.

Look at my red box down there. Bears already tried to short APPL in the red box and currently losing. Bulls bought it back and the trend continues upwards. What is suppose to change when you start shorting? Consider the short when it goes up higher to the clear resistance level, THEN take the risk if your fundamentals still hold true at that time.

There is no logical reason to short right now from what I see.

upload_2019-4-17_12-0-18.png



upload_2019-4-17_12-1-15.png


upload_2019-4-17_12-2-58.png


upload_2019-4-17_12-7-33.png
 
Last edited:
perfect efficiency - no... otherwise we'd be all wasting time here :)

What I am saying is there is no money to be made with the way retail traders think... this is a game where the pros take the retails to the cleaners.. they have everything at disposal.. the media machine, the analysts smoke mirror, the buying power to move price (to certain extent)..

We retail have nothing.

the only way to win, is to figure out how the pros try to take us to the cleaners... their actions leave a trail - the narratives they push, the upgrade/down grade, the price action.

You can't beat them... JOIN them.

The game seems different depending on time frames. On intraday, market makers appear to fade day trader order flow. I wonder how widespread and if there is a net effect of inducing short covering on longer term stock prices? On position trades, long term institutional decisions are based on long term metrics while the news media leads the public by the nose with short term earnings reports.

Has not fading news on stocks been profitable for more than a century?
 
The game seems different depending on time frames. On intraday, market makers appear to fade day trader order flow. I wonder how widespread and if there is a net effect of inducing short covering on longer term stock prices? On position trades, long term institutional decisions are based on long term metrics while the news media leads the public by the nose with short term earnings reports.

Has not fading news on stocks been profitable for more than a century?

intraday is complete waste of time... I have nothing to contribute here :)

short covering is irrelevant for long term in years/decades.

fading the news... maybe.. but it's about unfolding a story.... if it were that easy just to fade the news then there will be no money to be made either.

this is a sport where only a select few can win... something simple like fading the news, something that anybody can do, will not be profitable.
 
kmiklas,

I disagree with shorting APPL now.

Looking at the weekly and daily chart, trend is up. Buy Apple now, with a stop at $192.

If you are going to short, you have to wait to price get to up there again, then short.

Look at my red box down there. Bears already tried to short APPL in the red box and currently losing. Bulls bought it back and the trend continues upwards. What is suppose to change when you start shorting? Consider the short when it goes up higher to the clear resistance level, THEN take the risk if your fundamentals still hold true at that time.

There is no logical reason to short right now from what I see.

View attachment 200941


View attachment 200942

View attachment 200944

View attachment 200945
This is a technical response to a speculative argument.

I’m short for the speculative reasons specified in the OP, especially revenue issues pertaining to iPhone, which accounts for 2/3rds of AAPL revenue.
 
Back
Top