a_person's debating style

[sameeh55]

Quote from a_person:

Oh and btw, your numbers are lying/misleading:

Here is the list of Politburo Members from 1919 to 1940.
http://www.cyberussr.com/rus/polit-hist.html

I am sorry a_person but you are accusing Tresor of having disputable websites yet you present us with a link to a page in a website that has no credibility whatsoever.

Regards,

Sameeh

 

[a_person]

Quote from sameeh55:

Quote from a_person:

If you have evidence to counter his, please present it! what is it with a sewer language a_person?

I presented the evidence, 9 out of 10 Politburo members were not jewish, 99% of russian jews had just as little to do with Communism as 99% of ethnic russians, georians, ukrainians etc. Accusing the Jews of Communism is a hallmark of jew hating, neo-nazi idiots.

On top of that the nazi boy accused the jews of the Ukrainian Famine and the Holocaust. Not a single credible government, news organization or historian shares these views. With idiotic friends like him do you guys really need enemies?

 

[a_person]

Quote from sameeh55:

Quote from a_person:

Oh and btw, your numbers are lying/misleading:

Here is the list of Politburo Members from 1919 to 1940.
http://www.cyberussr.com/rus/polit-hist.html

I am sorry a_person but you are accusing Tresor of having disputable websites yet you present us with a link to a page in a website that has no credibility whatsoever.

Regards,

Sameeh

Unlike Tresor's anti-semitic websites, this one does not have an agenda. It's not pro or anti-Israel, it's not zionist or antisemitic. It's just a list of ALL Politburo members between 1919 and 1940. If you find anyone missing on that list, please enlighten us, otherwise shut up.

 

[a_person]

Oh yeah?

Quote from Debaser82:

ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the person" or "argument against the person") is an argument which links the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of a person advocating the premise.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

And to "call a spade a spade" is to speak honestly and directly about a topic ...to be outspoken, blunt, even to the point of rudeness; to call things by their proper names without any “beating about the bush”

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_call_a_spade_a_spade

 

[Debaser82]

Quote from a_person:

Oh yeah?


And to "call a spade a spade" is to speak honestly and directly about a topic ...to be outspoken, blunt, even to the point of rudeness; to call things by their proper names without any “beating about the bush”

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_call_a_spade_a_spade

Joshua 6:2 And the LORD said unto Joshua, Thou shalt not discredit thy neighbour's arguments by default as it is no man that can possess all of truth by himself.

 

[sameeh55]

Quote from a_person:

That's actually a good point, the views expressed on that site represent the views of that site's owners and no one else.

It is a fact that the owners of this website share an identical belief system to yours a_person. You both use identical language in attacking what you perceive as opponent to Israel. Also, the fact that you both (a_person and the owners of the website) claim to be Zionists should be an enough evidence that not only will you pose a threat to who you view as goys, but also honest and moral Jews who oppose your ideology.

Also, the fact that the owners of this website, who claim to be Zionist like you, follow identical methods of intimidation used by white supremacist groups, leads me to the conclusion that you, as a Zionist, have been taught well a_person.

Regards,

Sameeh

 

[a_person]

Quote from Debaser82:

Joshua 6:2 And the LORD said unto Joshua, Thou shalt not discredit thy neighbour's arguments by default as it is no man that can possess all of truth by himself.

Well, I am not religious. Besides if the LORD was familiar with millions of anonymous antisemitic postings all over the internets that have been debunked hundreds of times already, the LORD would probably reconsider what he "said unto Joshua".

 

[sameeh55]

Quote from a_person:

Oh no problem at all.

Tresor, I am absolutely one hundred percent sure that you have never read the Protocols and likely have never heard of them before and I am truly sorry if I ever unintentionally implied that you did.

It's just too bad that you're spewing absolutely the same hateful anti-semitic lies, insinuations and propaganda that were originally published in the Protocols by your jew-hating predecessors and are spread through anti-semitic websites and other means of Islamo/Nazi propaganda machine by your Jew/Israel hating friends and allies.

Are you satisfied, sameeh? How is that for an apology .LOL, have not your learned not to play stupid games with me. You are just not good enough at them.

Have you read the protocol a_person? If no, then how would you know what is written in it?

 

[a_person]

Quote from sameeh55:

as a Zionist, have been taught well a_person.

Actually I am self-taught but I appreciate your words which I interpret as a compliment to my professional, logical, courteous and intelligent debating skills and manners. Oh and while I am at it I want to thank you for this thread, it's a huge boost to my ego to have a thread dedicated to me. Very few posters have been honored with their own threads.

 

[a_person]

Quote from sameeh55:

Have you read the protocol a_person? If no, then how would you know what is written in it?

Until then The Protocols remained obscure; it was now an instrument for blaming Jews for the Russian Revolution.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion

Now kindly tell me how this is different from what the nazi boy Tresor is saying, including in this thread? Looking forward to your pathetic spin and the nazi boy's video blaming the Holocaust on the jews.