Quote from 1a2b3cppp:
If you insist on doing this strategy, why not wait to begin until a series of consecutive down days?
This has nothing to do with the Monte Carlo fallacy although many people might think it does.
Thanks for your suggestion, but how many down days should I wait for? Two, five, ten? It's a rigged game, and I certainly don't know which days will be up or down. Anyone who does is probably on a remote island and not posting here on ET.
I started sim trading the system and posting results on 4/13. The two previous days were up days, and the six previous days were all down/flat. The only way to win is to be in, and this is one way of doing it, albeit a far from perfect one.
If I had started the system on 4/11 instead of 4/13 it would be flat after four trades, instead of minus twenty points after two. And if I had stayed in school and gotten my degree I would just now be getting home from a ten hour day of kissing someone's ass at work, instead of coming in from shooting hoops with my boys, after working a half day at home. Shoulda, woulda, coulda...
The system works well in a bull market with narrow ranges, as we had from January to March. Now that the market is worried about the international economic slowdown, doesn't like the jobs numbers, blah, blah, blah, we have seen a marked increase in both down days and volatility.
What's to say the powers that be won't decide tomorrow that there has been enough correction for now, and we put together five or more straight up days?
