Trends only exist in the past. Any thinking in this manner is sure to end in ruin.
It's the wrong way to view the market.
It's the wrong way to view the market.
Quote from Carboncredit:
Trends only exist in the past. Any thinking in this manner is sure to end in ruin.
It's the wrong way to view the market.
Quote from outsource:
trends only exist in the pats, and cycles exist in the future![]()
Quote from ProfLogic:
A trend [The current direction of a chart or of the price of an asset depicted on a chart. Trends can vary in length from short, to intermediate, to long term.] is a cycle [ A succession of periodically recurring oscillation tops and bottoms, attaining maximum and minimum values, returning toward each previous top or bottom value equal to the last like value, in perpetuity.]
Trends, like cycles are always present in real time on all price charts. Those trends are either bullish, bearish or consolidating but clearly recognizable if one utilizes a consistent and concrete definition to pin point the exact pivots of the cycle tops and bottoms.
Price is always moving from a cycle top to a cycle bottom or from a cycle bottom to a cycle top.

Quote from outsource:
Thank you!![]()
Then you'd want to find a cycle on 30min chart and trade the trend on 5min chart![]()
Quote from ProfLogic:
Since each chart is read independently, why would you read the cycle on one chart and then arbitrarily apply "that" trend to an entirely different and faster incremental chart?
That would be like grabbing a road map of New York to find a route in Georgia.
Quote from ProfLogic:
I know you can post coherently.
I've read some of your previous posts.
Had a bad week?
