A top banker said "the American people are too stupid..." do you agree :D

these statements regarding loans are inaccurate, totally false and extremely harmful to anyone who would attempt to proceed in this manner. this reminds me of the militia groups that try to use the "soveriegn individual" defense in court. it does not work.


surfer:)
 
What's the relation with French government :D

Why he is not assassinated. Well I don't know, perhaps that you can find the answer here below - that is supposed to be the Doctrine of Beria the "Himmler" of Stalin :D (there is a doubt about the origin of the text: although the author has really existed because he made a testimony in front of Congress Ron Hubbard has made a similar book - according to his son - but it doesn't change if it is scientology or Beria's text on the principle :D):

http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/psychopolitics.html

"Violent activity against such persons might bring about their martyrdom. Defamation, and the accusation of insanity, alone should be employed, and they should be brought at last under the ministrations of psychopolitical operatives, such as psychiatrists and controlled psychologists."

I have studied sect member testimonies and they said: you are "free" but you will be attacked by other members if you emit a strange idea in the sect referential. Well that is what is happening: do they need to kill somebody since people will think that it is not a common belief and so will reject it.


Quote from balda:

Harry, you are asking a lot of questions.
Is everything OK with French government?

Why this site is still running? and
Why owner of the site is not assassinated?
More...
 
What is inaccurate talk about details don't stay in generality it's too easy you know to claim without pointing confronting with your own knowledge ? Don't forget that you have in front of you an accountant man so if you say something inaccurate yourself you will be obliged to be confronted with details and when details come you can't hide behind generalities - obvious I know but it's just for insisting that you must care about what you affirm yourself :D.

As for practical result he says :D

exerpt :

"THE RESULTS: Some people have purchased Tom's books and asked the bankers questions. Results vary.

In a number of cases, without going to court, the lender volunteered to repay the loan from you to the bank, which paid off the loan from the bank to you! Millions of dollars of bank loans have been paid off.

Tom's books have over 600 questions to ask the banker. One person sent the banker 40 questions. The lender responded by sending bank "zero balance owed" on his car loan. His $12,000 car loan became zero.

We heard similar stories from homes to credit card debts.

At this time, bankers resist zeroing out larger loans. We are told that some lenders make you sign an agreement saying that you will not tell, so others will not ask to have their loans zeroed out.
"

Now I don't incite people to try except if their situation is hopeless. It's just so fun for me to attack common belief of people :D.

Quote from marketsurfer:

these statements regarding loans are inaccurate, totally false and extremely harmful to anyone who would attempt to proceed in this manner. this reminds me of the militia groups that try to use the "soveriegn individual" defense in court. it does not work.


surfer:)
More...
 
you are barking up the wrong tree in an attempt to attack capitalism. What you are really attacking is CENTRAL PLANNING, although you don't realize it. The current centralized banking system is NOT CAPITALIST in essence. It is essentially a big hunk of centralized quasi-fascist( or socialist depending on your attitude) regime in the center of our economy.
 
by the way don't soil the name of Victor S. by associating him with crackpot conspiracy theories.

"Crashmaker" is a FICTION NOVEL for pete's sake ! However, it does have an editorial message about the dangers of massive non-democratic centralized power, which is embodied by the Federal Reserve.
 
To whom are you talking :D

Because if it is me sorry but I must be the first to say that this system has more and more ressemblance with socialism and even communism than anything else at least since a few dozen years :D

Quote from dotslashfuture:

you are barking up the wrong tree in an attempt to attack capitalism. What you are really attacking is CENTRAL PLANNING, although you don't realize it. The current centralized banking system is NOT CAPITALIST in essence. It is essentially a big hunk of centralized quasi-fascist( or socialist depending on your attitude) regime in the center of our economy.
More...
 
Sorry this is on their site crasmaker http://www.crashmaker.com/ and not part of the fiction as they claim:

"By reading CRA$HMAKER, you can decide who’s right— the Founding Fathers, or the people who support the Federal Reserve, income taxes, and the other paraphernalia of what Lara Bernot calls America’s modern gangster government."

"GANSGTER GOVERNEMENT" : do you see this term ? It is more than just a warn of danger it is an affirmation that I wouldn't dare to make as for myself :D

So I'm not worried for them: they are not like other cowards that fear the eyes of others because of reputation. They defend the truth whatever the consequences. As for me it is the same : you can try any operation I will say the truth - even if I have to revise my own beliefs - with documents accompagnying them since I'm not the kind of person to believe in Aliens and Knight Templars like others ... except with proofs of course (do you have some then I will believe in Knight Templars ) :D.

Quote from dotslashfuture:

by the way don't soil the name of Victor S. by associating him with crackpot conspiracy theories.

"Crashmaker" is a FICTION NOVEL for pete's sake ! However, it does have an editorial message about the dangers of massive non-democratic centralized power, which is embodied by the Federal Reserve.
More...
 
Sorry I neither believe in Alliens or Knight Templars like you :D

As for this site sorry also to say that they present no proof . I have proofs from somewhere else that's why I agree with this site. But it not your case: so as for me this is very significant that you just take as proof what you want whereas with real documents from official source you are capable of being denying facts stupidly :D

Quote from freealways:

Guys, this time the article isn't an unlikely aliens story but factual and deserving of merit.

A bank lends out moneys based on their capital.
If it receives deposits it then can again lend out against such deposits and if such a loan is shown as a credit in one's cheque account the bank hasn't actually lend out money so much as actually merely created a paper entry.

I haven't as yet read the full article as I am unable to print it out (HELP).

I also remember that many years ago I was involved in a legal situation with a bank and the solicitor hinted that the banks who were owed money couldn't really collect because they hadn't actually lend money so much as created some fictitious money and that, if worst came to the worst, and the bank was confronted with such a type of defense the bank was likely to withdraw any action to collect.

Perhaps there is someone more experienced ( a solicitor or economist) who can throw some further light on this ?

freealways
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top