The majority of educated people are morons, eh? Whatever. Only in FC's fantasy world.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
A statistically representative climate change debate
- Thread starter Pekelo
- Start date
The majority of educated people are morons, eh? Whatever. Only in FC's fantasy world.
The majority of educated people are morons, eh? Whatever. Only in FC's fantasy world.
The majority of educated people know that AGW is a fact. The majority of morons think it is not. You fit in with the latter.
The majority of educated people know that AGW is a fact. The majority of morons think it is not. You fit in with the latter.
You are going to feel very silly in about 30 years when AGW is totally debunked and mankind is primarily concerned with natural global cooling as the leading climate concern - which is what rational educated people have been telling you for the past decade.
This debate is never going to end, is it?
Well it's tough when you show someone that up really is up and they instead say it's down. There is no winning an argument with an irrational person.
Well it's tough when you show someone that up really is up and they instead say it's down. There is no winning an argument with an irrational person.
But it's like a typical political argument between 2 drunks on bar stools. You actually agree on some points, but neither side is willing to admit that the other drunk is even a little bit right.
For instance, when someone stated that there is a difference between "causes" and "contributes", you both agreed, but it sparked more of a debate.
It's like the world either has to fry or freeze for this one to be solved. But if things remain the same for the next 100 years, there is still the possibility of frying or freezing. Sheesh.
You are going to feel very silly in about 30 years when AGW is totally debunked and mankind is primarily concerned with natural global cooling as the leading climate concern - which is what rational educated people have been telling you for the past decade.
You are overestimating the thoughtfullness of futurecurrents, my guess is that he will still be spreading global warming alarmism 30 years from now, when we still have polar bears, newyork isnt under water, and both the poles still have ice, he will just have a different name for it.
You are going to feel very silly in about 30 years when AGW is totally debunked and mankind is primarily concerned with natural global cooling as the leading climate concern - which is what rational educated people have been telling you for the past decade.
Unless CO2 suddenly stops being a greenhouse gas that will never happen.
And ice blue gummy bears will soar into the skies on the backs of pink marshmallow peeps to assassinate greenhouse gases with peppermint stick machine guns and save the planet if we all vote democrap and pay higher taxes.The majority of educated people know that AGW is a fact.
And ice blue gummy bears will soar into the skies on the backs of pink marshmallow peeps to assassinate greenhouse gases with peppermint stick machine guns and save the planet if we all vote democrap and pay higher taxes.
Holy shit you're an idiot.