A statistically representative climate change debate

you are drone liar.

you link to the study - anderegg, cooks... name it... you link to it I will show you that you are mispresenting the study or the study is full of shit.

only 41 papers out of more than 11000 support the idea that man made co2 is causing global warming.... and they are mostly based on failed models.



Total and unadulterated horseshit. Virtually ALL of them do.

And you keep repeating the lie that the models failed. They haven't.


Less than 0.03% of all the world's climatologists reject the overwhelming consensus and common sense science of AGW.


Jem, what the hell is wrong with you? Seriously. Argue what we should do about it if you want. But arguing that the science is wrong is akin to saying 15 is more than 30. That argument is over. Give it up. You sound like an idiot.
 
Save your breath FC, the sheep have been sheared. They are unable to think outside the political talking points they are fed.


attachment.php
 
Yes, NASA. Apparently you actually CAN'T read. That explains your deluded state. http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/

The Earth Observatory is part of the EOS Project Science Office located at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
webmaster: Paul Przyborski | NASA official: Charles Ichoku

Was it difficult growing up with failed reading comprehension? Are your parents disturbed that they raised a retarded parrot that merely squawks "97%" all the time?

oxA11Qf.jpg
 
Centuries from now, a large swath of the West Antarctic ice sheet is likely to be gone, its hundreds of trillions of tons of ice melted, causing a four-foot rise in already swollen seas.

Scientists reported last week that the scenario may be inevitable, with new research concluding that some giant glaciers had passed the point of no return, possibly setting off a chain reaction that could doom the rest of the ice sheet.

For many, the research signaled that changes in the earth’s climate have already reached a tipping point, even if global warming halted immediately.

“We as people see it as closing doors and limiting our future choices,” said Richard Alley, a professor of geosciences at Pennsylvania State University. “Most of us personally like to keep those choices open.”

But these glaciers are just the latest signs that the thawing of earth’s icy regions is accelerating. While some glaciers are holding steady or even growing slightly, most are shrinking, and scientists believe they will continue to melt until greenhouse gas emissions are reined in.

“It’s possibly the best evidence of real global impact of warming,” said Theodore A. Scambos, lead scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

Furthest along in melting are the smallest glaciers in the high mountainous regions of the Andes, the Alps and the Himalayas and in Alaska. By itself, their melting does not pose a grave threat; together they make up only 1 percent of the ice on the planet and would cause sea level to rise only by one to two feet.

But the mountain glaciers have been telling scientists what the West Antarctica glacier disintegration is now confirming: In the coming centuries, more land will be covered by water and more of nature will be disrupted. A full melt would cause sea level to rise 215 feet.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/20/science/the-melting-isnt-glacial.html?hpw&rref=science
 
Back
Top