A statistically representative climate change debate
- Thread starter Pekelo
- Start date
another droneographic from a study you are so proud of, you refuse to cite the source.
who wants to bet it has been completely debunked.
By the way... why don't your produce a paper showing man made co2 causes warming on earth. We know why... there is no science. Just failed models.
who wants to bet it has been completely debunked.
By the way... why don't your produce a paper showing man made co2 causes warming on earth. We know why... there is no science. Just failed models.
Here's more proof jem. You can lie and distort all you want but the fact is that it's 97%.
--hide the decline
--destroy the data
--pressure journals to not publish authors who don't back the swindle
and their colleagues declared them innocent of malfeasance!! it's true science!!
Hitler's colleagues declared him innocent, too.
Let these idiots get away with this crap and we'll see science go the way of the nba and nfl, where they've turned them into nothing but leftist political advocacy.
They'd have us believe a theory is superior to empirical data if all the scientists agree. As if science was a democracy. You take a vote. Then they stack the orgs with political hacks and attempt to speak for everyone. Then they get people defunded and fired if they disagree.
This is why i actually detest the republican party. Because it is too chicken shiat to stand up to these lying frauds.
--destroy the data
--pressure journals to not publish authors who don't back the swindle
and their colleagues declared them innocent of malfeasance!! it's true science!!
Hitler's colleagues declared him innocent, too.
Let these idiots get away with this crap and we'll see science go the way of the nba and nfl, where they've turned them into nothing but leftist political advocacy.
They'd have us believe a theory is superior to empirical data if all the scientists agree. As if science was a democracy. You take a vote. Then they stack the orgs with political hacks and attempt to speak for everyone. Then they get people defunded and fired if they disagree.
This is why i actually detest the republican party. Because it is too chicken shiat to stand up to these lying frauds.
Record Heat, Drought and Santa Ana Winds Spark California Wildfires
"A combustible combination of record heat, intense drought and powerful and desiccating Santa Ana winds has helped fuel several wildfires in California. On Wednesday, fire crews battled a rapidly spreading 100-acre wildfire in Carlsbad, California, about 35 miles north of San Diego. At 1 p.m. PT, conditions in Carlsbad were ideal for supporting a growing fire, with wind gusts near 30 miles per hour, a temperature of 100 degrees Fahrenheit, and just 3% humidity.
"According to NBC 4 News in Los Angeles, the AlertSanDiego system called at least 11,600 homes, businesses and cell phones to instruct people to evacuate. The fire began at 10:40 a.m. P.T. "and moved quickly," according to NBC 4. The network is reporting at least five major fires burning in San Diego County, with multiple homes on fire in Carlsbad, California.
See also: Climate Change Now Impacts Daily Life, U.S. Report Finds
"Other fires have erupted near Camp Pendleton in San Diego County, and a fire southwest of Rancho Bernardo has burned at least 1,500 acres, according to CalFire.
"Officials were opening shelters for evacuees of the Carlsbad blaze, known as the Poinsettia Fire, and evacuations have been ordered near Camp Pendleton as well.
"Santa Ana Winds have brought record heat to much of southern and central California this week, with wind gusts in hilly areas reaching close to 90 miles per hour, as temperatures have soared above 100 degrees Fahrenheit in many areas. In San Diego, which is typically cooled by onshore winds off the Pacific Ocean to the west, the strong Santa Ana winds from the east have resulted in some of the hottest May temperatures on record since data began in 1896."
"A combustible combination of record heat, intense drought and powerful and desiccating Santa Ana winds has helped fuel several wildfires in California. On Wednesday, fire crews battled a rapidly spreading 100-acre wildfire in Carlsbad, California, about 35 miles north of San Diego. At 1 p.m. PT, conditions in Carlsbad were ideal for supporting a growing fire, with wind gusts near 30 miles per hour, a temperature of 100 degrees Fahrenheit, and just 3% humidity.
"According to NBC 4 News in Los Angeles, the AlertSanDiego system called at least 11,600 homes, businesses and cell phones to instruct people to evacuate. The fire began at 10:40 a.m. P.T. "and moved quickly," according to NBC 4. The network is reporting at least five major fires burning in San Diego County, with multiple homes on fire in Carlsbad, California.
See also: Climate Change Now Impacts Daily Life, U.S. Report Finds
"Other fires have erupted near Camp Pendleton in San Diego County, and a fire southwest of Rancho Bernardo has burned at least 1,500 acres, according to CalFire.
"Officials were opening shelters for evacuees of the Carlsbad blaze, known as the Poinsettia Fire, and evacuations have been ordered near Camp Pendleton as well.
"Santa Ana Winds have brought record heat to much of southern and central California this week, with wind gusts in hilly areas reaching close to 90 miles per hour, as temperatures have soared above 100 degrees Fahrenheit in many areas. In San Diego, which is typically cooled by onshore winds off the Pacific Ocean to the west, the strong Santa Ana winds from the east have resulted in some of the hottest May temperatures on record since data began in 1896."
The year of 2007 was of particular importance for the science of climate
change, with the work done by IPCC1 producing irrefutable evidence of
climate change due to human activities, and putting an end to arguments on
the scientific credibility surrounding global warming. The fourth IPCC Report
reveals consistent trends of how the worldâs climate is evolving2 towards
increased warming with profound consequences for the global climate and,
therefore, for human beings.
The IPCC 2007 Report indicates that, since 1750, global atmospheric
concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide have markedly
increased as a result of human activities and now far exceed pre-industrial
values determined from ice cores spanning many thousands of years. Global
increases in carbon dioxide concentrations are due primarily to fossil fuel use
and land use change, while increases in methane and nitrous oxide are primarily
related to agriculture (IPCC 2007a).
http://www.pnuma.org/deat1/pdf/Climate_Change_in_the_Caribbean_Final_LOW20oct.pdf
change, with the work done by IPCC1 producing irrefutable evidence of
climate change due to human activities, and putting an end to arguments on
the scientific credibility surrounding global warming. The fourth IPCC Report
reveals consistent trends of how the worldâs climate is evolving2 towards
increased warming with profound consequences for the global climate and,
therefore, for human beings.
The IPCC 2007 Report indicates that, since 1750, global atmospheric
concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide have markedly
increased as a result of human activities and now far exceed pre-industrial
values determined from ice cores spanning many thousands of years. Global
increases in carbon dioxide concentrations are due primarily to fossil fuel use
and land use change, while increases in methane and nitrous oxide are primarily
related to agriculture (IPCC 2007a).
http://www.pnuma.org/deat1/pdf/Climate_Change_in_the_Caribbean_Final_LOW20oct.pdf
An article detailing several climate shifts from 10,000 B.C. to 2,000 B.C.
http://www.ukessays.com/essays/hist...-the-cradle-of-civilization-history-essay.php
No cars. No steel mills. No oil refineries. No industry at all. AND most importantly, no evil Americans destroying the earth. How in the world did all this happen? The article doesn't even address all the DRAMATIC climate shifts before 10,000 B.C., or any number of DRAMATIC climate shifts which occurred after 2000 B.C., but prior to the little blip we're currently experiencing. All happening without the evil man and his industrial technology. Climate changes...yes it does, with or without us, and apparently more dramatically without us. At least that what the FACTS and EVIDENCE shows us to date, but let's not muddy up reality with facts. Can't have that, now can we lefties?
One last thing. Can your data "precisely" predict climate change? Answer is no. If it could we'd all have been frozen over by now using your data from the 60's and 70's, and cooked alive using data since. And what does that mean? You don't have science fact, you have theory, and it's not even science theory. It's politically driven dogmatic theory bordering on a cult like religious zealotry.
http://www.ukessays.com/essays/hist...-the-cradle-of-civilization-history-essay.php
No cars. No steel mills. No oil refineries. No industry at all. AND most importantly, no evil Americans destroying the earth. How in the world did all this happen? The article doesn't even address all the DRAMATIC climate shifts before 10,000 B.C., or any number of DRAMATIC climate shifts which occurred after 2000 B.C., but prior to the little blip we're currently experiencing. All happening without the evil man and his industrial technology. Climate changes...yes it does, with or without us, and apparently more dramatically without us. At least that what the FACTS and EVIDENCE shows us to date, but let's not muddy up reality with facts. Can't have that, now can we lefties?
One last thing. Can your data "precisely" predict climate change? Answer is no. If it could we'd all have been frozen over by now using your data from the 60's and 70's, and cooked alive using data since. And what does that mean? You don't have science fact, you have theory, and it's not even science theory. It's politically driven dogmatic theory bordering on a cult like religious zealotry.
You just figured out that the climate can change without man? Good for you.
However, you are still under the mistaken belief that cooling was the main prediction of the 70's. Not that it really matters.
Yes, science, not the left, has tons of science showing man made global warming. That's why 97% of all climatologists believe it along with virtually every science org in the world. And then there is the common sense thing. CO2 is a ghg and we have raised it's levels by 40%. Think about for it for a second.