Quote from IronFist:
Hey, I got a pm to come check put this thread.
There was indeed a lot of ambiguity in the jjrvat thread, including the normal "guru" type of stuff:
- Cherry picked charts
- Example charts with different time frames with no explanation of why one might be 50 ticks and another 1 minute or x number of volume
- avoiding specific questions
But that is to be expected on this forum.
That is not to say jjrvat is a "guru". He was the first person to open my eyes to the idea of price action, and while he may be a successful trader, perhaps he just wasn't able to convey everything he wanted in the thread, or maybe part of his trading is intuition, which he could not quantify.
But there was too much vagueness in his answers, so I decided to extrapolate from that thread concrete, 100% mechanical rules for a trading system. I'll post them if you want.
Hi Ironfist.
Long time I haven't post in ET and I am glad that you are still in the business.
First, I am flattered for the "He was the first person to open my eyes to the idea of price action". For the rest of your comments I find them quite surprising and a little disappointed especially after all the time we expend trying to address your questions.
That thread became messy and out of control. Not only because spammers, the lack of tools in ET to manage a thread but especially because of the amount of newbies that wanted everything chewed and with pre-cook / pre-made instructions. I am also glad that you are trading price action but I am disappointed because I see now that you missed most of the message in that thread.
It wasn't meant to be a 100% mechanical rules. If you want that you were looking in the wrong place with Price Action. You need quant trading, fast algos,etc ,etc and some statistical edge. The cherry picked charts you mention were all from posters asking questions. I remember you posting a 5 minute chart i think with a 50 SMA and I developed 5 or 6 post around your time frame and instrument (as I did with many other posters with tick, vol, time, oil, ES, forex, etc etc).
My only point was the principles not 'teaching" a premade system. I expend hundred of post trying to explain that timeframes, indicators, time, etc were independent of some basic quantifiable price principles.
True, I avoided ALL questions that were aim to a chewed system. I used MA's for reference only (as I posted examples with all other indicators) and people and newbies keep coming with what MA 21 or 15 or etc...they missed the point and I lost my patience in the process.
I will happily discuss or answer any of your price action questions but I won't answer or discuss a canned indicator system or why a 12, 21, 45 or whatever system you backtested doesn't work. First, because I don't have a clue what you were trying to test and second I don't have a clue how can you translate price action reading to a quantifiable argument for an autonomic trading system.
I insist if you are looking for mechanical system, the price action principles we were discussing are useless. For the rest, I am always up for a discussion about price action.
jjrvat
. Things that didn't work last week may work this week. What matters is positive expectancy of your setup and your ability to continue to take the same setup again and again without fail. In other words, just because you see something not working last 2 weeks, you should not dump your setup and move on to something new every week as there is no holy grail. You will have losses guaranteed which does not mean your setup is bad. I don't know of (not come across) a setup that has no losses nor do I know of a setup thats extremely precise. Pick the channel in a time frame as the trend. Pick the signal that you want to play in the direction of the channel. Make sure your RR > 2. And end of the day study/review if you took all the signals you wanted to take and if you played it correctly by honoring the stop and the target.