The ability of the radical leftist to rationalize their way through reality and facts never ceases to amaze. You're providing a real case study into the mind of the radical leftist, and ideological dysfunction in it's purest form. Thanks.
"A Shocking Truth": Donna Brazille Accuses Clinton Campaign Of "Rigging" Primary
- Thread starter ThunderThor
- Start date
What I can say is that the investigation into Russian interference is based on extremely serious events and being conducted by some of the most serious people in the American justice system. They aren’t playing any games. You might think this topic is some kind of game to make false equivalencies but it isn’t.
As corrupt as Trump and Sessions have proven themselves to be with their unending lies and in Trumps case the firing of Comey, the core of the justice Department and the fbi is strong. If there is a crime associated with the dnc and Clinton I’m confident they will find it and the same is true for the Russian interference.
Somebody is going to go to jail for this. It probably will only be some low level staffer that is thrown under the bus --- but still, somebody is going to jail for this. Just a matter of time.
Russian interference is serious, very serious. No less serious, not one iota less serious, is a presidential candidate trying to game the primary electoral process to give themselves an opportunity in the general election, an opportunity which they would not have had if they didn't manipulate that process. If it is found that the Trump organization, and perhaps Trump himself colluded with Russians, then they belong in a prison cell. Clinton and anyone in her organization belong in that same cell if it's found they colluded and rigged the primary process. Both parts of our electoral process, the primary and the general, are equally important. We can't have an honest general election if any of the candidates rigged the primaries to begin with. You want a serious look into one half of the system, and some kind of casual glance at the other half. I want the entire system put under equal scrutiny, especially considering the way in which a piss poor candidate was somehow able to win a primary when it was crystal clear that the will of the people clearly favored the other candidate, Bernie Sanders. Add the fact that now democratic leaders coming forward with very serious allegations of improprieties, and actual telling of said events as they witnessed them, a special prosecutor is absolutely warranted. Actually it is imperative that both parties be put under equal and intense scrutiny if we the people are to have any trust in our electoral process moving forward. Anything less is simply not acceptable. Only a partisan hack, completely lost in their ideology would disagree.
So the statue for a special prosecutor expired in 1999, so you’ll never get that unless congress passes a law.
As I explained before, there is not a need for a special counsel absent a conflict of interest. Mueller was only appointed because Sessions had to recuse himself for hiding meetings with Russian offials and Trump fired Comey.
So the question to you is, what is the conflict of interest that requires a special counsel to investigate the dnc and Clinton?
And this isn’t a flimsy question. You can’t just make something up to play games with our justice system. The fbi is fully capable handling an investigation into Clinton and the dnc.
