A religion of peace which worships the same God? not per ISIS and Burke

Good1,

You really need to travel more and really look to nature.

So would you be like Paul who thought you could look at the landscape and make determinations about god?

I have. I see death and danger built-in to the landscape.

I see ignorance built in to the landscape.

I see stomachs built in to the landscape.

And i see predators built in to the landscape.

I also see death dealing danger built in to the landscape.

Tsunamis, volcanoes, storms, twisters, hurricanes, floods, and droughts.

I see a limited landscape, up against birth rates.

I see everything necessary to create a hell-on-earth for every creature here.

Then i see Judeo-Christianity, which is what Catholicism is, saying that the Son of God has a completely different birthright, subject to none of the death dealing dangers built into the landscape.

So i see a great WITHHOLDING from one KIND of "son" (Adam) compared to another kind of Son (the Son of God).

So i see injustice, especially when i see that same god expecting the same response from the neglected "son".

I see more injustice when same god exacts punishment and death upon the good son, to make up for the bad son.

If you can't see that is NOT justice, then what hope is there for you?

This is all enough to drive a desert nomad like Muuhhoomood insane.

How many priests did he meet, and try to reason with, in regards these very same issues?

It tells me that Judeo-Christians would be killing at the same rate as Mudamet's devoted followers, IF it was spelled out in a book that they believed was god-given.

You don't need to question how i know any of this.

You're not in a position to judge my answer, reason with me, or analyze my analysis.

I would allocate limited (built in) cognitive resources to listening.

If you really think there is fault in my analysis, make a statement that you believe is true, so that we can examine it together.
 
So would you be like Paul who thought you could look at the landscape and make determinations about god?

I have. I see death and danger built-in to the landscape.

I see ignorance built in to the landscape.

I see stomachs built in to the landscape.

And i see predators built in to the landscape.

I also see death dealing danger built in to the landscape.

Tsunamis, volcanoes, storms, twisters, hurricanes, floods, and droughts.

I see a limited landscape, up against birth rates.

I see everything necessary to create a hell-on-earth for every creature here.

Then i see Judeo-Christianity, which is what Catholicism is, saying that the Son of God has a completely different birthright, subject to none of the death dealing dangers built into the landscape.

So i see a great WITHHOLDING from one KIND of "son" (Adam) compared to another kind of Son (the Son of God).

So i see injustice, especially when i see that same god expecting the same response from the neglected "son".

I see more injustice when same god exacts punishment and death upon the good son, to make up for the bad son.

If you can't see that is NOT justice, then what hope is there for you?

This is all enough to drive a desert nomad like Muuhhoomood insane.

How many priests did he meet, and try to reason with, in regards these very same issues?

It tells me that Judeo-Christians would be killing at the same rate as Mudamet's devoted followers, IF it was spelled out in a book that they believed was god-given.

You don't need to question how i know any of this.

You're not in a position to judge my answer, reason with me, or analyze my analysis.

I would allocate limited (built in) cognitive resources to listening.

If you really think there is fault in my analysis, make a statement that you believe is true, so that we can examine it together.
God exists. True or false?
 
God exists. True or false?

A good God exists.

An idol does not exist.

The good God is NOTHING LIKE WHAT JUDEO CHRISTIANITY (or the landscape) tells us.

The idol is everything like what Judeo Christianity, (and the landscape) tells us.
 
Ok so that's a statement you think is true.

How shall we begin to examine it's veracity?

If you say that you do not think you suffered too much, then I am obviously wrong as only you know the life path you went through.
So whatever your evaluation is true, at the moment you evaluate it. Obviously, you could change your mind down the line, and it would then still be true.
 
If you say that you do not think you suffered too much, then I am obviously wrong as only you know the life path you went through.
So whatever your evaluation is true, at the moment you evaluate it. Obviously, you could change your mind down the line, and it would then still be true.
Alas, is this what truth is like in the Catholic world?
 
You asked me how to evaluate the veracity of my statement.
I explained to you that the veracity lies with how YOU assess it. Nothing Catholic in that, just simple psychology.
 
You asked me how to evaluate the veracity of my statement.
I explained to you that the veracity lies with how YOU assess it. Nothing Catholic in that, just simple psychology.

Then the veracity of the Catholic world lies in how YOU assess it.

The operative word is 'lies'.

Simple psychology.
 
Good1,
I do not know your own life path. I only based my VERY subjective opinion, just a mere opinion, on the very little and few posts you posted that I understood.
Now, I can be very wrong in thinking that may be in your view, you suffered too much. If you think that, then it is obviously a very valid opinion just now.
 
Back
Top