I made these two demo trades on 2/25. One is an IWM MAR 106/113/116 butterfly. IV of these options at the time of the trade were 24.06, 18.48 and 16.42 respectively. The other is an IWM MARCH 107/112/115 butterfly. The IV of these options at the time of the trade were 23.37, 19.96 and 17.13 respectively.
I'm surprised by the rapid incline in value on the 107/112/115 butterfly compared to the 106/113/116 butterfly. I'm trying to understand exactly what caused it. Implied volatilities are greater on all legs of both butterflies than at the time of trade initiation. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm guessing it has to due with the volatilities rising or falling at different ratios between the two flies, as well as the risk profile (one puts about $4000 at risk while the other puts about $2000 at risk), and the different deltas. I'm also guessing that if the volatilities dropped instead of rising at the same ratios, the 107/112/115 fly would be hurting right now, losing value as fast as it gained value in this example. What's your take? Here are the screen shots:
I'm surprised by the rapid incline in value on the 107/112/115 butterfly compared to the 106/113/116 butterfly. I'm trying to understand exactly what caused it. Implied volatilities are greater on all legs of both butterflies than at the time of trade initiation. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm guessing it has to due with the volatilities rising or falling at different ratios between the two flies, as well as the risk profile (one puts about $4000 at risk while the other puts about $2000 at risk), and the different deltas. I'm also guessing that if the volatilities dropped instead of rising at the same ratios, the 107/112/115 fly would be hurting right now, losing value as fast as it gained value in this example. What's your take? Here are the screen shots: