You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
A New Grand Jury Will Hear Evidence In The Trump Investigation
- Thread starter Frederick Foresight
- Start date
They did.Old Grand Jury didn’t produce?
Regular Grand Jury led to the Special Grand Jury.
And when the “Special” Grand Jury is finished, we will enlist the Double Secret Grand Jury?They did.
Regular Grand Jury led to the Special Grand Jury.
I figured you would google to learn about the two grand juries, and why they are convened in cases.And when the “Special” Grand Jury is finished, we will enlist the Double Secret Grand Jury?
Let me ask you this, based only upon what you know and believe, and if you had to guess,
would you guess that the indicted Trump entity is not guilty of any wrong-doings?
I figured you would google to learn about the two grand juries, and why they are convened in cases.
Let me ask you this, based only upon what you know and believe, and if you had to guess,
would you guess that the indicted Trump entity is not guilty of any wrong-doings?
Im under the impression that a “Special” grand jury is impaneled to look at evidence of a specific nature that the regular Grand Jury has neither the time or ability to investigate.
Hence my question, if the Special GJ can’t pinpoint the deed, do we impanel another and another till we get the desired outcome?
Seems the country has already gone thru two impeachments plus a plethora of other Orange Man inquisitions, this comes across as sour apples.
I see you ignored my question about Trump entities.Im under the impression that a “Special” grand jury is impaneled to look at evidence of a specific nature that the regular Grand Jury has neither the time or ability to investigate.
Hence my question, if the Special GJ can’t pinpoint the deed, do we impanel another and another till we get the desired outcome?
Seems the country has already gone thru two impeachments plus a plethora of other Orange Man inquisitions, this comes across as sour apples.
If a prosecutor gets a hung jury, and tries the suspect again, and a third time, is it sour grapes, or is it that The State believes that the suspect is guilty, and also that it is in the interest of justice to exhaust its prosecutorial remedies?
In order to suggest that the above prosecutor is suffering from sour grapes, one must believe in the innocence of the suspect. Hence, my previous question to you about the Trump organization's innocence.
It's obvious to me, that many people here that argue with those who are proudly against Trump, also believe Trump is a criminal--but for reasons I am not motivated to get into right now, refuse to confirm their true feelings here.
The regular grand jury, and special grand jury look at different things.
If you are investigated and considered by a grand jury, the evidence may suggest you are part of a bigger, criminal enterprise; which would invoke a special grand jury, that will be given more time. This is nothing extraordinary.
I haven't researched it, and I'm not aware of any special, special, grand juries.
I see you ignored my question about Trump entities.
If a prosecutor gets a hung jury, and tries the suspect again, and a third time, is it sour grapes, or is it that The State believes that the suspect is guilty, and also that it is in the interest of justice to exhaust its prosecutorial remedies?
In order to suggest that the above prosecutor is suffering from sour grapes, one must believe in the innocence of the suspect. Hence, my previous question to you about the Trump organization's innocence.
It's obvious to me, that many people here that argue with those who are proudly against Trump, also believe Trump is a criminal--but for reasons I am not motivated to get into right now, refuse to confirm their true feelings here.
The regular grand jury, and special grand jury look at different things.
If you are investigated and considered by a grand jury, the evidence may suggest you are part of a bigger, criminal enterprise; which would invoke a special grand jury, that will be given more time. This is nothing extraordinary.
I haven't researched it, and I'm not aware of any special, special, grand juries.
I would imagine if every big corporation or entity was put under an extreme legal microscope, they’d all be guilty of something. Just depends on how far you want go to find dirt on someone.
As to the Special GJ, if their current line of investigation doesn’t pan out, I’m sure they’ll need another GJ to widen the scope of the investigation, because we all know the Orange Man is guilty.
The prosecutor in this whole thing with Trump is Cyrus Vance.
As I have said twice before, and which undoubtedly has been ignored twice before, is that at some point, Cyrus Vance will be in the crosshairs. Republicans and other investigative groups will find out why he had a sudden, irrational to the point of leaving the judge aghast, need to go into a Manhattan Court and request a reduction in the criminal sex offender status of.......wait for it...........Jeffrey Epstein. The not only refused it but just found it mind blowing. To say nothing of the fact that NYC is wall-to-wall with convicted sexual offenders so what the hell is a senior level prosecutor doing going in to do a favor for just one out of them?
Let me tell ya, boys and girls, Epstein had something on him- BIGTIME, and furthermore, Jizz Maxwell may have more to say on it.
So, there I go again for a third time. But I am sayin, that republicans and others should be doing their homework and bring Cyrus Vance down while he is busy trying to bring Trump down. I think he may be stepping back a little or retiring or something but I would chase him down, and take him down.
What he did was outrageous and he was unable to provide a convincing explanation. And you know who else agrees with me?......the judge. Yup Epstein had something on him.
MORE TO COME at some point.
Manhattan DA’s office asked judge to lower Jeffrey Epstein’s sex offender status in 2011
CNN —
As part of multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein’s so-called “deal of a lifetime,” he was required to register as a sex offender in states where he lived, including in New York.
There, Epstein’s attorneys asked that he be given Level 1 offender status, the least restrictive level. Meanwhile, the State of New York Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders reviewed his history of abuse allegations and recommended he be classified as a Level 3 sex offender, the highest possible risk level.
But in a strange turn, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office agreed with Epstein’s team. When the case went before the Manhattan Supreme Court in January 2011, the prosecutor asked that Epstein be labeled a Level 1 sex offender.
That argument drew pointed questions from Judge Ruth Pickholz, who said she had never seen the prosecutor’s office make a “downward argument” like this, according to an appeals court filing. She rejected the request and termed Epstein a Level 3 sex offender.
https://news.google.com/search?q=cyrus vance epstein&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en
As I have said twice before, and which undoubtedly has been ignored twice before, is that at some point, Cyrus Vance will be in the crosshairs. Republicans and other investigative groups will find out why he had a sudden, irrational to the point of leaving the judge aghast, need to go into a Manhattan Court and request a reduction in the criminal sex offender status of.......wait for it...........Jeffrey Epstein. The not only refused it but just found it mind blowing. To say nothing of the fact that NYC is wall-to-wall with convicted sexual offenders so what the hell is a senior level prosecutor doing going in to do a favor for just one out of them?
Let me tell ya, boys and girls, Epstein had something on him- BIGTIME, and furthermore, Jizz Maxwell may have more to say on it.
So, there I go again for a third time. But I am sayin, that republicans and others should be doing their homework and bring Cyrus Vance down while he is busy trying to bring Trump down. I think he may be stepping back a little or retiring or something but I would chase him down, and take him down.
What he did was outrageous and he was unable to provide a convincing explanation. And you know who else agrees with me?......the judge. Yup Epstein had something on him.
MORE TO COME at some point.
Manhattan DA’s office asked judge to lower Jeffrey Epstein’s sex offender status in 2011
CNN —
As part of multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein’s so-called “deal of a lifetime,” he was required to register as a sex offender in states where he lived, including in New York.
There, Epstein’s attorneys asked that he be given Level 1 offender status, the least restrictive level. Meanwhile, the State of New York Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders reviewed his history of abuse allegations and recommended he be classified as a Level 3 sex offender, the highest possible risk level.
But in a strange turn, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office agreed with Epstein’s team. When the case went before the Manhattan Supreme Court in January 2011, the prosecutor asked that Epstein be labeled a Level 1 sex offender.
That argument drew pointed questions from Judge Ruth Pickholz, who said she had never seen the prosecutor’s office make a “downward argument” like this, according to an appeals court filing. She rejected the request and termed Epstein a Level 3 sex offender.
https://news.google.com/search?q=cyrus vance epstein&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en
Do you imagine that Google, or Facebook, or Microsoft, has done what the Trump organization is/was guilty of doing?I would imagine if every big corporation or entity was put under an extreme legal microscope, they’d all be guilty of something. Just depends on how far you want go to find dirt on someone.
Or worse?Do you imagine that Google, or Facebook, or Microsoft, has done what the Trump organization is/was guilty of doing?