A Neo-Con Actually Has Good Advice For Republicans

Memo to House GOP
Feb 3, 2014, Vol. 19, No. 20 • By WILLIAM KRISTOL

Election Day is almost nine months off. But right now Republicans seem almost certain to hold the House of Representatives and are likely to take the Senate. Which raises the inevitable question: How might the GOP seize defeat from the jaws of victory?

Two occasions stand out, two obvious obstacles ahead that could lead to disastrous Republican stumbles, two pitfalls on the path to a happy GOP Election Day. Republicans are pretty good at falling into such pits. One is the increase in the debt limit, which Congress will have to deal with in the next month or two. The other is immigration reform, which the Senate has passed and which awaits a decision from the House leadership on how to proceed.

Conservative activists tend to get excited at the prospect of a debt ceiling increase, since it allegedly gives them a rare moment of leverage over the president. There is already a conservative wish list of items that could be attached to the coming debt limit legislation. But as we saw in the somewhat analogous situation of the government shutdown in October, such leverage is often more theoretical than real, especially when you only control one house of Congress and are divided among yourselves in that chamber. With the country and the markets, egged on by the media, spooked by the threat of default, it’s not clear how much “leverage” House Republicans will really have.

So conservative activists should give up their fond hopes of a debt ceiling bonanza and more or less let the hike go through unscathed (they can still vote against it, of course). Conservatives will have plenty of opportunities to try to attach their favorite proposals to must-pass legislation in 2015, if they want to, under more politically favorable circumstances. Meanwhile, during 2014, conservatives certainly can and should aggressively advance freestanding legislative proposals, to repeal and delay parts of Obamacare, for instance, and they’ll be better off with a clean debate on such legislation free of the specter of default.

In return for making life easier on the debt ceiling for the House leadership, Speaker Boehner should make his own concession: He should announce that he will not bring any immigration legislation to the floor this session. If there’s one thing that could blow up GOP chances for a good 2014, it would be an explosive debate over immigration in the House. The only sure way to avoid such a debate is not to let anything onto the floor in the first place. Once even an innocuous-sounding measure gets passed, then the pressure to go to conference with the loathed Senate bill will be great. And whatever ultimately were to happen, activists would spend months worrying about and agitating against a betrayal by the leadership, business interests would spend months urging such a betrayal, and Republicans would be consumed by infighting and recriminations on an issue that does them no short-term political good. Bringing immigration to the floor insures a circular GOP firing squad, instead of a nicely lined-up one shooting together and in unison at Obamacare and other horrors of big government liberalism. Since there really is no need to act this year on immigration, don’t. Don’t even try.

In sum: With respect to the must-pass debt ceiling legislation, the House conservatives should let it pass. With respect to immigration reform, which isn’t must-pass, leadership should let it die. The guiding principle should be do no harm. This year, doing no harm requires both conservative activists and the GOP establishment to sacrifice something. So they should make a deal: No default in return for no amnesty. Such a deal should mean no GOP tears this November.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/memo-house-gop_775315.html
 
Do you think we'll actually be able to out-vote the parasites Onazi has "hired" to vote dem for free goodies? People aren't looking for work anymore (basically given up), the msm will stop at noting to control the large amount of sheep, and the dems will now intimidate even more tea party, and common sense groups with gubment audits, etc., In fact, the scumbag Schumer is apparently trying to sick the IRS on tea party members. America has NEVER seen corruption, and communism on this level...:(
 
Do you think we'll actually be able to out-vote the parasites Onazi has "hired" to vote dem for free goodies? People aren't looking for work anymore...

I've read from multiple sources over recent months that the next election could be good for (R)'s.

I'm not overly excited though, for three reasons.

1) Tea Party (R)'s notwithstanding, most (R)'s are really RINO's and barely any better than your average domocrap.
2) The parasites will vote (D) no matter what.
3) Voters, "independents" in particular, have notoriously short memories. So despite the consternation over Obamacare etc. I'm not planning on any election night celebratory partying.
 
I've read from multiple sources over recent months that the next election could be good for (R)'s.

I'm not overly excited though, for three reasons.

1) Tea Party (R)'s notwithstanding, most (R)'s are really RINO's and barely any better than your average domocrap.
2) The parasites will vote (D) no matter what.
3) Voters, "independents" in particular, have notoriously short memories. So despite the consternation over Obamacare etc. I'm not planning on any election night celebratory partying.

I'm not holding my breath either. And yes, it's sad to see people calling themselves independent forget just how much damage this tyrannical government has done in the last five years. I will say, however, it would be amazing to see R's take the Senate, and keep the house. I bet Onazi would shit his flowered nazi panties, and we could have a fighting chance. Will he just resort to executive order? You bet he would! He's already publicly said he would. But ridding ourselves of nazis in he senate, and R's keeping the house... Wow!
 
I think the situation is not that dire. Obama won two fairly close elections against very weak republican candidates. The first came on the heels of the disastrous Bush presidency. The second featured poor turnout by traditional republican voters. Obama, for all his faults, was an historic candidate, who managed to leverage his race and perceived celebrity status to get the votes of traditional democrat groups plus low information single females, etc. Duplicating that will be hard.

The House elections are determined largely by the makeup of individual districts. The democrats' insistence on gerrymandering to get black pols elected has blown up in their face. By putting large numbers of democrats in a single district, the adjoining districts tend to have natural republican majorities. Unless Boehner manages to alienate the party base, the House should be secure for republicans.

The Senate turns on a handful of seats that are in play. Democrats will have to defend roughly twice as many seats as republicans, and many of those seats are in states that are not reliably blue. The tasks for republicans, other than to refrain from further alienating their base, will be to nominate people with enough common sense not to make idiotic statements and to prepare to combat the usual democrat vote fraud. Those sound like reasonably easy tasks but they have proven extremely problematic the past few years. The vote fraud issue is particularly troubling now that the Justice Department is actively trying to facilitate it.
 
I think the situation is not that dire. Obama won two fairly close elections against very weak republican candidates. The first came on the heels of the disastrous Bush presidency. The second featured poor turnout by traditional republican voters. Obama, for all his faults, was an historic candidate, who managed to leverage his race and perceived celebrity status to get the votes of traditional democrat groups plus low information single females, etc. Duplicating that will be hard....
I hope you're right.
 
Good advice. William Kristol actually makes sense when he refrains from talk of invading Middle eastern countries.

fan27
 
Back
Top