Quote from NY0BScalper:
Care to explain the holes in my reasoning and show what you believe I am missing? Any of the claims I made I can backup with credible, incontraverible evidence.
I understand the reasoning that spending heavily on national security though pre-emptive military positioning in regions with a particularly high frequency of radical anti-Americans could be a wise idea; if we don't stop these people, our infrastructure and the ability of Joe American to live his Joe American life is threatened, and not spending on Iraq would therefore be penny wise and pound foolish for America. This reasoning is, however, entirely incorrect as A) our stated mission is unaccomplishable, and B) in chasing the unachevievable mission, we only create more unachievable missions which we'll have to take on; throughout our history, this has been the case. Why would this time be different?
America will prevail. People all around the world deserve a better life. America gives them a chance. Everything will work out all right in the end.