A Message to Racialists

[oddiduro]

Quote from seker2k:

Sounds like Usury to me.

Christianity and Islam forbid usury.

The Talmud allows ursury emposed on gentiles, and alot of other sick shit.

Get your facts straight, before you come here and make an ignorant fool of yourself.

If Christianity and Islam forbade usury de facto rather than de jure, there would be no Christians or Muslims working at banks that lend at interest. Banks would be owned and operated by Jews. If Christians and Muslims are so lax in their standards as to compromise thier spiritual principles for a dollar ( i.e. a job, or a mortgage) then this again points to Jews as a more robust group in a Darwinistic sense.

Perhaps you should rethink your arguments.

Best Regards
Oddi

 

[oddiduro]

Quote from ilikefox es:

You need to take this up with the media, with the political parties, and with the whiners themselves, because they all agree that the whiners don't just speak for themselves, but for all of em. If you succeed in correcting all of them, I will Then accept your argument. Until then, no can do.

Based on your argument, then you too take your marching orders from a media which you know has an agenda. That is rather strange. It does not take more than a bit of anecdotal research to see that there is no such thing as all, none, always, and never. So, if you tend to believe what you see on the network news, well, not much anybody can do about that.

Best Regards
Oddi

 

[oddiduro]

Quote from Alexis I:

Judeo-Christianity is a propaganda term that was invented at a time when the Jews were already in full control of the media and governments of the major Western nations. There is no such thing as Judeo-Christianity, for Judaism and traditional Christianity are thoroughly incompatible. The Jews killed Jesus Christ, who, contrary to Jewish propaganda, was not Jewish himself.

-----------------------------------------

Benjamin Freedman on "Judeo-Christianity

Another word is creating more problems among Christians. I refer to "Judeo-Christian". You see it more and more day by day. Based on our present knowledge of history, and on good sense applied to theology, the term "Judea-Christian" presents a strange combination. Does "Judeo" refer to ancient "Pharisaism", or to "Talmudism", or to so-called "Judaism"? In view of what we know today, how can there be "Judeo-Christian" anything? Based upon what is now known "Judeo-Christian" is as unrealistic as it would be to say anything is "hot-cold" , or "old-young", or "heavy-light", or that a person was "healthy-sick", or "poor-rich", or "dumb- smart", or "ignorant-educated", or "happy-sad". These words are antonyms, not synonyms. "Judeo-Christian" in the light of incontestable facts are also antonyms, not synonyms as so-called or self-styled "Jews" would like Christians to believe. More sand for Christian's eyes.

An "Institute of Judeo-Christian Studies" has been established by Seton Hall University. It is actually a "one-man Institute". Father John M. Oesterreicher is the "one-man Institute". The "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies" occupies a small office in a down-town office building in Newark, N. J. This "one-man Institute", according to their literature, has no faculty except Father Oesterreicher, and no students. Father Oesterreicher was born a so- called or self-styled "Jew" and became a convert to Catholicism. I have had the pleasure of hearing him talk on many occasions. Addresses by Father Oesterreicher and literature by mail are the principal activities of the "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies". Father Oesterreicher also plans to publish books and circulate them throughout the world, in large quantities.

Father Oesterreicher leaves no stones unturned to convince Catholics that "Judaeo-Christian" is a combination of two words that are synonyms theologically. Nothing could be further from the truth. Father Oesterreicher impresses that viewpoint upon his Catholic audiences. Father Oesterreicher talks to Catholic audiences only, so far as I am able to tell. In his addresses Father Oesterreicher impresses upon Catholics the opinion he personally holds on the question of the dependence of the Christian faith upon so-called "Judaism". His audiences depart Father Osterreicher's addresses very much confused.

It would make better Catholics out of Father Oesterreicher's audiences if he would "sell" Jesus and the Catholic Church rather than try to "sell" so-called "Judaism" to his audiences. Well-planned and well-financed publicity by so-called or self-styled "Jews" manages to keep Christians well informed on the subject of so-called "Judaism". If Father Oesterreicher would concentrate upon "selling" Jesus and the Christian faith to audiences of so-called or self-styled "Jews" he would be doing more towards realizing the objectives of Christian effort. The activities of this "one-man Institute" are somewhat of a deep mystery. But I am certain that Monsignor McNulty will never allow the "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies" to bring discredit upon the fine record of Seton Hall as one of the foremost Catholic universities anywhere. But it will bear watching, and Monsignor McNulty will always appreciate constructive comment.

http://www.iamthewitness.com/FreedmanFactsAreFacts.html


------------------------------------------

Dr. Duke on Judeo-Christianity

Recently, I have been shocked and appalled by the unqualified support by some Christian televangelists for the most anti-Christian religion on the face of the earth, Judaism. They also support the corrupt, Jewish supremacist, anti-Christian Israeli state. I know that some of you reading this may respond by saying that Islam is really the most anti-Christian religion and that Judaism is a friendly faith. Many mistakenly think that Judaism is a sister religion to Christianity. The term “Judeo-Christian” has entered our modern lexicon to the point where no politician, George Bush on down, would dare even invoke the term “Christian heritage” without adding the prefix, “Judeo” to it. The term “Judeo-Christian” didn’t even come into existence until after the Second World War when Jews became supreme in their influence over major media.

The truth is that there is no such thing as Judeo-Christianity. That would be like saying Satanic-Christianity. The religion now called Judaism did not even come formally into existence until six hundred years after Jesus Christ. It began with the codification of the Babylonian Talmud. In Judaism, the Talmud is the supreme scripture, not the Old Testament. Only Satanism can rival Judaism’s vicious hatred for Jesus Christ. The Talmud even claims that Jesus Christ is being punished in hell by “being boiled in hot semen!”1 When I first read this hateful Talmudic quote, I just couldn’t believe it. Maybe you don’t believe what I am saying right now, but read on and I will prove to you that this quotation is accurate and that Judaism is intrinsically and viciously anti-Christian. Judaism it the embodiment of the same Satanic tradition that Christ condemned when He referred to “the synagogue of Satan.” (Rev. 2-9) What I say here I can prove in the documented words of the most sacred texts of Judaism and in the clearly documented words of the highest authorities of Judaism itself, and even more importantly, in the scriptures of the New Testament.

Interestingly enough, Islam is much closer to Christianity than Judaism. For instance, Judaism condemns the Virgin Mary as a prostitute and viciously condemns Jesus an evil sorcerer and a bastard. The Talmud even claims Jesus was a sexual pervert who had intercourse relations with his donkey. In stark contrast, although Islam certainly does not share all the Christian views of Jesus Christ, it views Christ as a true prophet of God, virgin-born, and that God resurrected Jesus from the dead. Ironically, the chief religious book of Islam, the Qur’an, actually defends Jesus Christ from the obscene slanders made against Him in the Jewish Talmud.

I know that I am shocking many of you who are hearing this for the first time. I am sure some of you are thinking that this cannot be true! I don’t blame you for thinking so because many of you have never been told of these facts by the Jewish-dominated media or by the televangelists. So, I will document these things for you right now in the little space I have here. Also, remember that for a more complete and thorough documentation of this issue, you can go to my chapter on Judaism and Christianity in my autobiography, My Awakening. You can also find it in my new book, Jewish Supremacism. The chapter on Judaism found in My Awakening is at http://www.duke.org/awakening/chapter17_01.html. It is fully documented and footnoted.

Jesus was not a Jew? This is not what is stated in the New Testament. Joseph and Mary were Jewish, which would make Jesus' earthly gentic profile Jewish, or Judiac, whichever you prefer, as well.

Best Regards
Oddi

 

[ratboy88]

Quote from oddiduro:

Jesus was not a Jew? This is not what is stated in the New Testament. Joseph and Mary were Jewish, which would make Jesus' earthly gentic profile Jewish, or Judiac, whichever you prefer, as well.

Best Regards
Oddi

which NT? the rupert murdoch version? is your bible copyrighted? most are because they have been altered.

 

[oddiduro]

Quote from Alexis I:

The Poor-Little-Meeeeeees
By Patrick Grimm

Continued:
http://zionistwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/poor-little-meeeeeees/

Alexis, let's cut to the chase, as you have not ansered my query.
The Euro racialist says that Jews are "subhuman", that they are not as smart as the Gentile. Yet, they seem to dominate the Gentile wherever they go.

The Euro racialist is stating without realizing it that he is incompetent in the face of a foe he believes to be inferior.

Jews are inferior, yet they control the media, politics, and finance.

Jews are inferior, yet they send Gentiles to die for them at will, in wars that they create, again at will.

According to your exhaustive documentation, Jews seem to establish a distinct pattern of behavior that sets them apart. So, when a bank is established that has usury as it's basis, why would gentiles put their money there, especially if usury is forbidden by Christian standards? You would have to know the tree by it's fruit, would you not? This is just one small example.

Explain to me Alexis, how Gentiles are dominated by such an inferior foe?

Best Regards
Oddi

 

[oddiduro]

Quote from ratboy88:

which NT? the rupert murdoch version? is your bible copyrighted? most are because they have been altered.

A fair rebut.

Can you provide an unaltered copy, along with proof that it has been unaltered? I will settle for passages from it that indicates that Jesus was not a Jew.

Best Regards
Oddi

 

[oddiduro]

Quote from ratboy88:

see.. it happened again. i immediately think of doodoo when i read posts like this.

I don't know doodoo, could you please enlighten me?

Best Regards
Oddi

 

[ratboy88]

Quote from oddiduro:

A fair rebut.

Can you provide an unaltered copy, along with proof that it has been unaltered? I will settle for passages from it that indicates that Jesus was not a Jew.

Best Regards
Oddi

welll you are the one that quoted the bible. so.. i guess go look at it and see what year it was copyrighted. then look at the publisher... rupert murdoch has quite a few bibles out there.

my understanding is that Jesus was an essene... so if they are jews.. then Jesus was a jew.

 

[MajorUrsa]

Quote from chuck.ells:

So, what you're saying is that the jews were just standing around one day, minding their own business, when all of a sudden ........? what happened?

And this something happened over and over? Throughout time? Come on now, whats the real story?

I agree with you that your questions are the same as mine. But I agree with ddooo that the way you package them suggest that you know the answer. But yoo don't tell us.

I still haven't seen the answer. Alexis just vomits another 1000 lines of insinuation, basically telling that because the jews were hated so much there must be a reason for it. I don't buy that. Also, quoting Dick Nixon that Jews were behind the communist 'conspiracy' is not very convincing; Nixon was a nutcase with paranoic tendencies and would see anything as a conspiracy.

I see nothin special in Jews, or it must be that their religion tells them they are a chosen ppl, which is as nonsensical to me as any religion. MAybe because of this they were always treated seperately and eg. not allowed to participate in normal economic life. Thus they were forced to trade and they invented banking. Like most traders they would have been hated for 'living of the wind'. But in the end they end up holding all ropes.

Nothing to hate them for; if anything, admire them.

Ursa..

 

[Kingofposters]

Quote from Alexis I:

The term "Jew" was not used until the 7th century. Jesus was from Judea, and the term Jew was used to describe all inhabitants of Judea regardless of ethnicity or religion. Much later, it was also used to refer to the Phariseans. Many tribes lived in Israel at the time of Jesus Christ, and him being a Judean does not mean that he was a member of the "Jewish" tribe who were referred to as "the Pharisees" at the time.

The following article might clarify this semantically misunderstood subject.


Jesus was a 'Judean', not a Jew.

During His lifetime, no persons were described as "Jews" anywhere. That fact is supported by theology, history and science. When Jesus was in Judea, it was not the "homeland" of the ancestors of those who today style themselves "Jews". Their ancestors never set a foot in Judea. They existed at that time in Asia, their "homeland", and were known as Khazars. In neither of the manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described or referred to as a "Jew", just as the term "Texan" signifies a person living in Texas.

In spite of the powerful propaganda effort of the so-called "Jews", they have been unable to prove in all the recorded history that there is a record, prior to that period, of a race religion or nationality, referred to as "Jew". The religious sect in Judea, in the time of Jesus, to which self-styled "Jews" today refer to as "Jews", were known as "Pharisees". "Judaism" today and "Pharisaism" in the time of Jesus are the same.

Jesus abhored and denounced "Pharisaism"; hence the words, "Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites, Ye Serpents, Ye Generation of Vipers".


http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com/identity/Was-jesus-jewish.html

Some of the most nonsensical claptrap I have read on ET.