A Message from Ron Paul.

Quote from Haroki:

This psychological defense mechanism is referred to as "displacement".

One way you can usually tell that an individual is using displacement is that the emotion being displaced (e.g., anger) is all out of proportion to the reality of the situation. The purpose of displacement is to avoid having to cope with the actual reality. Instead, by using displacement, an individual is able to still experience his or her anger, but it is directed at a less threatening target than the real cause. In this way, the individual does not have to be responsible for the consequences of his/her anger and feels more safe--even thought that is not the case.

It isn't even a stretch of the imagination for some to blame 9/11 on Bush or the New World Order . This is the insane "logic" of most psychological defense mechanisms. They temporarily spare you from the painful reality around you and give you the illusion that you are still in control.

The cognitive dissonance required to have all these contradictory beliefs swirling around in one's brain is astonishing. But besides the primary function it serves to erase from consciousness what is happening in the world today, it is serving a secondary purpose--it makes them feel in control of what might come.
More...

I think it is much simpler than some grad level psych course bullshit. Maybe it is just the awful truth and all the antidepressants and therapy in the world can't change it. It is ok my friend, open your eyes go and dig around a little .You will see it if you try. It is scary to think that your government/daddy may be doing bad things.
 
There are a wide variety of ways that psychological denial can be expressed by a person who is unconsciously defending or protecting themselves from unwanted knowledge, thoughts, or feelings. What follows is a partial list of denial strategies.


.............

"Affect Storm" or Exaggerated Emotional Responses

This is a hyperemotional response to anything that threatens the veneer of denial or that questions the motivations of the denier.

EXAMPLE: Take your pick among the usual ad hominem attacks leveled at anyone who has the audacity to disagree with the person in denial or to question his denial.
 
haroogi is an expert psychoanalyst. he is a former member of est where he learned to crap in a corner to express his inner feelings. members were encouraged to tear down their walls so they could be built back by the group think.

hirushi learned a lot.... he no longer is a scatologist specialist he has moved on to greater things. he seeks approval for pancake theories and lashes out when people dont agree with him.

although he knows the pancake theory never was credible..... for him it is about loyalty. he wants people to follow him regardless of reality. that is the true sign of friendship for shatoogi. and he craves relationships given his lack of bonding at any mature level.

he is seriously thinking of approaching ZZZzenu given their vast similarities. he has had his eye on scientology for awhile now and he is thinking this is the perfect path for him. he cant wait for his first audit..... but he is scared of doing new things.

Good Luck Pancake Hiroakee!!!!

Freud-and-couch-1-copy.jpg
 
DEALING WITH OTHERS IN DENIAL

..........

• Don't give into the temptation to call them names or to do unto them what they might be doing unto you…

Sometimes you may think you have put an issue to rest and successfully argued your point; only to discover that later the denier will bring up exactly the same slogans or mantras that you had previously and painstakingly countered!

As you can see from the above list, it is quite difficult and time-consuming; as well as frustrating and endlessly repetitive to engage a person in denial.
 
engaging a person in denial can be a endless task. As I said in Part II, "You can lead a denier to reality, but you can't make him/her think."
 
so haroki, you a Mccain man? thats working out real well huh? has he officially dropped out yet? sucks when your own people bail on you in july.

oh wait... maybe you're a huckbee kinda guy. he did real well 2nd qtr... i think the only worse one was tommy thompson ... no i take it back.. gilmore dropped out and tancredo aint too far behind him.

hold on.. you're out in cali.. so you are a duncan hunter boy. he is tough on terror!!!! what an imbecile.

can i interest you in a flip flopping mormon that is ashamed of his religion? poor dog riding on the roof for 12 hours going to ontario.. thats rough. i just saw a video this weekend of Mutt Romney bashing the R in republican.. what a doofus. talk about funny... he had less cash on hand than Paul till he loaned himself 9 million. trying to buy the presidency... oh the people just eat that shit up.

a seriously pathetic group.... whose your fave?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top