Quote from austinp:
Educators registered as NFA members have tight restrictions on what they can promote to the public... starting with any references on actual profits made in real accounts with real money or anything otherwise.
All text or recorded videos that reference profits, potential profits in any manner must be submitted to the NFA for scrutiny before publication. That process of course takes forever and three days to complete.
Educators are required to post standard CFTC disclaimers on hypothetical trade results because anything that happened in the past without every single person who ever views the material in that trade for the exact fills entered & exited would be assumed hypothetical to achieve the same.
Bottom line is the NFA is tough, they are very restrictive to the point of stifling when it comes to educational promotion. Members cannot discuss their own trading results even when it includes real money in real time unless first cleared by the NFA in each instance separately.
It sounds like this person in question violated a lot of rules, needless to say. The NFA does have teeth, they do levy big fines where necessary and should take massive action against this person or entity in question.
Thanks very much for that. My guess is that an educator who falsely claimed to have an award or falsely claimed to have won a trading competition would not be favourably looked on by the NFA. Presumably using false information like this in advertising would be considered a breach of the NFA code.
!!
!!