A Great Victory - Trump expected to withdraw from Paris climate agreement

give us the link...

is it a real peer reviewed journal or the pay one that has been cited as a fraud by academics.

what does the paper say about man made co2.

exGOPer said:
"Four of our papers have undergone extensive scrutiny by the scientific community, and the newest, a paper with the analysis of the human component, is now posted, along with the data and computer programs used."
More...
 
what should impress you is that there is not one peer reviewed paper stating man made co2 is causing warming. that was not relying on now failed models.

yet there are myraid peer reviewed studies indicating the sun the tides, ocean temps, aerosols, clouds and may other natural factors impact warming.




exGOPer said:
This is supposed to impress me how? The 1350 number? That's not how science works - I gave direct link to the data which I am relying on, not on some ad hoc blogspam.
More...
 
This is what's amazing to me, right wingers who are willing to conclude that DNC and Hillary Clinton murdered Seth Rich based on complete speculation and garbage reporting that got completely retracted but they twist themselves into pretzels about something that scientists and academics from 190 countries agree upon - oh and they have no problem believing in creationism and all the religious garbage either. Right wing in US is now just a cult, you could tell them the earth is flat and they will call out disputing that as FAKE NEWS.
 
what are you hiding show us the link to the paper.
lets see it.


these posts undergo extensive scrutiny... that is the type of b.s. statement politicians run with. not credible academics. credible academics point to real data and publications in respected peer reviewed journals.

your team was published in fraudulent pay to publish journals. and yet there is still no science showing man made co2 causes warming... even if their papers published in fraudulent journals.

exGOPer said:
"Four of our papers have undergone extensive scrutiny by the scientific community, and the newest, a paper with the analysis of the human component, is now posted, along with the data and computer programs used."
More...
 
jem said:
what should impress you is that there is not one peer reviewed paper stating man made co2 is causing warming. that was not relying on now failed models.

yet there are myraid peer reviewed studies indicating the sun the tides, ocean temps, aerosols, clouds and may other natural factors impact warming.
More...

Again, Richard Mueller isn't using any 'models', in fact he criticizes them. The first paper listed on his site is about benefits of FRACKING of all things.

And what happened to your so called BINARY BS, other factors affecting warming doesn't mean man made CO2 (which is a huge amount even if you are a dumb layman) has no effect
 
we concluded hillary kiled seth rich as a fact?

why are you lying about the seth rich discussion. the discussion was about whether fox news claimed to have federal law enforcement sources. They did make that claim. Even if they then retracted the argument. They did make the claim. That is the difference between fact and fake dnc troll crap.

exGOPer said:
This is what's amazing to me, right wingers who are willing to conclude that DNC and Hillary Clinton murdered Seth Rich based on complete speculation and garbage reporting that got completely retracted but they twist themselves into pretzels about something that scientists and academics from 190 countries agree upon - oh and they have no problem believing in creationism and all the religious garbage either. Right wing in US is now just a cult, you could tell them the earth is flat and they will call out disputing that as FAKE NEWS.
More...
 
jem said:
what are you hiding show us the link to the paper.
lets see it.

these posts undergo extensive scrutiny... that is the type of b.s. statement politicians run with. not credible academics. credible academics point to real data and publications in respected peer reviewed journals.

your team was published in fraudulent pay to publish journals. and yet there is still no science showing man made co2 causes warming... even if their papers published in fraudulent journals.
More...

Jesus Christ

I linked you to the website, all you had to do is check the FINDINGS dropdown menu listed on the front page and click PAPERS but even that's a conspiracy for you, I hid that dropdown menu because of SETH RICH

Here, have it spoonfed - http://berkeleyearth.org/papers/
 
post the paper you low integrity troll. don't change the argument post the paper that backs op your claims....
we are curious to see if you were telling the truth or lying agian.

exGOPer said:
Again, Richard Mueller isn't using any 'models', in fact he criticizes them. The first paper listed on his site is about benefits of FRACKING of all things.

And what happened to your so called BINARY BS, other factors affecting warming doesn't mean man made CO2 (which is a huge amount even if you are a dumb layman) has no effect
More...
 
troll ass wipe.... I posted that link the last time we had this discussion and above in this thread.

now tell us which paper supports the statement you made. I want to read the paper. so I can see if it stands for anything with respect to man made co2.


"Four of our papers have undergone extensive scrutiny by the scientific community, and the newest, a paper with the analysis of the human component, is now posted, along with the data and computer programs used."




exGOPer said:
Jesus Christ

I linked you to the website, all you had to do is check the FINDINGS dropdown menu listed on the front page and click PAPERS but even that's a conspiracy for you, I hid that dropdown menu because of SETH RICH

Here, have it spoonfed - http://berkeleyearth.org/papers/
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top