A GOP Tsunami Is Coming

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from futurecurrents:

We don't need them and would better off without their obstructionism in congress. There is not single Republican position that I agree with, save for the nebulous philosophy of fiscal responsibility, which they have been miserable at implementing. They are the party of greed, entitlement of the wealthy, environmental disregard, militarism, ignorant religious dogma, human rights and freedoms denying, anti-science and pro corporate power over our government.

I hope this the beginning of the end of them. i fart in their general direction.

+1

 

[exGOPer]

Quote from Lucrum:

It's reality you cannot refute. Denying it is what YOU have to do to make yourselves feel better.

Most of them voted for Romney though.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from exGOPer:

Most of them voted for Romney though.

LOL !!!

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from exGOPer:

Most of them voted for Romney though.

"From the Gellman-paradox we know that the low-income voters who drag down the Red States average tend to vote disproportionally for Democrats. Republican voters earn significantly more than Democrats, even though Red state earn less than Blue states...

...Hardly surprising, we see that in a two-party split, 60-80% of welfare recipients are Democrats, while full time Workers are evenly divided between parties...

...You have similar results in this recent NPR-Poll. Among the Long Term Unemployed, 72% of the two-party support goes to Democrats....

The false impression that Republicans use more welfare is already spread around the internet by liberals who still trust Krugman."

 

[futurecurrents]

Is it true that the red states there with the exception of Idaho are also the ones with the most ignorant/illiterate populace in the nation? I'm pretty sure it is.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from futurecurrents:

Is it true that the red states there with the exception of Idaho are also the ones with the most ignorant/illiterate populace in the nation? I'm pretty sure it is.

That falsehood circulated by dishonest dumb fuck liberals like you was debunked years ago. Take your brothers dick out of your mouth and try to keep up.

 

[futurecurrents]

Yeah, just checked. The most illiterate states are also the most religious, and all in the south. So of course they voted for Romney.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from futurecurrents:

Yeah, just checked. The most illiterate states are also the most religious, and all in the south. So of course they voted for Romney.

Don't worry futureCUNTS. The "south" is now officially outnumbered by the entitlement/welfare/parasite class and their bleeding heart liberal cheerleaders, like you. You won.

 

[exGOPer]

Quote from Lucrum:

Don't worry futureCUNTS. The "south" is now officially outnumbered by the entitlement/welfare/parasite class and their bleeding heart liberal cheerleaders, like you. You won.

According to the data, about three quarters of these poor, non-black adults voted in the presidential election. Among the voters, 50% went for Obama. So among non-black welfare recipients, perhaps three in eight might be part of Obama's base. That share would amount to roughly 0.75% of his overall base.

We can use the same methodology to check the earlier supposition that all black welfare recipients did indeed vote. In fact, only about 75% of the blacks with children and family incomes under $20,000 did vote in 2008. If that also held true for welfare recipients, they could have made up no more than 0.75% of Obama's overall base.

Adding the figures in the last two paragraphs together, I got my final estimate: welfare recipients probably made up no more than 1.5% of Obama's overall voter base in 2008.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-altman/obama-welfare_b_1835061.html

 

[Mercor]

Quote from exGOPer:

According to the data, about three quarters of these poor, non-black adults voted in the presidential election. Among the voters, 50% went for Obama. So among non-black welfare recipients, perhaps three in eight might be part of Obama's base. That share would amount to roughly 0.75% of his overall base.

We can use the same methodology to check the earlier supposition that all black welfare recipients did indeed vote. In fact, only about 75% of the blacks with children and family incomes under $20,000 did vote in 2008. If that also held true for welfare recipients, they could have made up no more than 0.75% of Obama's overall base.

Adding the figures in the last two paragraphs together, I got my final estimate: welfare recipients probably made up no more than 1.5% of Obama's overall voter base in 2008.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-altman/obama-welfare_b_1835061.html

Against the whole population it is a small number. Within the states is where it matters. Obama won many states by a very small number and the Black vote was the difference.