DB, a question or two, even though I know you won't answer them.
Obviously, you feel those on public assistance should be allowed to have as many illegitimate children as they care to, and we taxpayers will be forced to support them. You also apparenlty feel that these same welfare recipients should be able to take all the illegal drugs they want without losing their benefits. Otherwise, they would be stigmatized, and we certainly wouldn't want someone living off the efforts of others to feel the least bit stigmatized.
So my first question is, are there any restrictions at all you would be comfortable imposing on welfare recipients? I am guessing citizenship or even legal status certainly isn't one. You feel it is appropriate to mock those who object to welfare recipients sitting around doing drugs all day and having children they can't support. So I want to know, is there any requirement you would impose on them, other than voting democrat?
Second, do you really think it is helping people to encourage generational welfare dependency? To implicitly endorse poor choices that will confine not only them but their children to a life of poverty?
Finally, do you think radical islam poses a threat to this country? And if it does, wouldn't it make sense at least to limit immigration by those infected with it or from countries where it is dominant?
You post endless pastes mocking or attacking people who have genuine concerns about these issues, but you never address the actual issue. So here's your big chance.