-----then you agree---Perhaps, for some time.
-----then you agree---Perhaps, for some time.
Two of us who have had (me), or still have (you), small businesses. And not surprised there are no others.
Also not surprised by all the know-it-all non-owners.
Two of us who have had (me), or still have (you), small businesses. And not surprised there are no others.
Also not surprised by all the know-it-all non-owners.
I own 2 businesses but I pay a salary not an hourly wage so maybe I dont qualify.
But I remember one contract with the government where all the secretaries who did a lot of heavy document lifting were shit except for 1 who was top notch and left after a short while for a better job. Why? the salary was absolute dog shit so they got what we paid for.
Somewhere between $7 and $15 is an effective middle ground but in labor you get what you pay for and business that run mainly on min wage at the low end often have shitty workers, high turnaround, no worker loyalty and a business stuck in the mud.
Those shitty workers don’t get better if you pay them more money. They are just shitty.
If you keep the same workers and just increase their wages then having shitty workers is the fault of management.
You can be more selective depending on how you manage your business. If instead of 7.25, I am paying 11.25 an hour I will expect a better worker and fire them if they don't because the salary gives me the ability to replace them very easily.
But when the min wage changes to 12. It punishes the good workers earning 11.25. I’ve seen it first hand. They don’t ask for money - they essentially go on strike.
That's the prerogative of the business, to get what they pay for. It's not the job of the government to decide what you pay bad workers. Minimum wage needs to be abolished posthaste.People get away with paying $300 a week for a shit job, then dont complain if you get shitty workers.