LOL, I think this link will have special meaning to you .00019 or bust ...Quote from .00019orbust:
The More You Know!
(star shoots across the television leaving a rainbow trail)

Quote from JSSPMK:
Red Ink, personally I believe that if a person needs to have a drink to place a trade, then he needs to be honest with himself by answering why the need for that 1 drink?
Obviously whatever the answer is it ultimately leads to psychological issues. Because money is at stake the OP is asking for an opinion which is ridiculously easy to comprehend, answer is based on common sense, reduce position size to an absolute minimum so that:
1. It is easier to pull the trigger when the right opp presents itself
2. Risk reduced
On this point, I don't disagree with you (wonder of wondersQuote from .00019orbust:
you've also touched a subject thats very dear to my heart, addiction. The word itself has always had a negative connotation, and i've just never bought into that association. i use to always say, its never one way. gave a few examples of addictions that are positive, addictions that go unnoticed in society (like coffee/caffeine), ect ect. people would say, "stop arguing just to argue, you know addiction is bad" when i was growing up. but i mean really, thats how I felt in middle school-college, and its the way I feel now.
).Quote from Red_Ink_inc:
JSSPMK, He didn't say he needed a drink to place a trade. If that's what he was saying then I'd have to agree that there's a massive problem. According to him, he's already a profitable trader of several years. He simply feels he has plateaued and is looking for something to get him over the apprehension of sizing up.
You meantioned psychological issues. Maybe several hours reclined on a leather couch talking to a shrink would help the OP get over this apprehension. Who knows?
Quote from JSSPMK:
Sizing up should not be much of an issue as long as risk remains same as before. ImPO his trading capital has to increase x2 for him to increase position size x2, perhaps he is rushing things.
One can say that this is a way of trailing your methodology, when your equity goes x2 and then goes back to original size you decrease position again and look for reasons why it happened.