You missed the point entirely. This isn't about Obama's grades, it's about the Obama administration preaching "openness" and "tranparency" and then being less open and less transparent than the previous administration.
"The only people who don't want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide." That's what Obama said on August 21, 2010. But the Obama administration has denied more FOIA requests than Bush (whom Obama called the most secretive President in history). When FOIA denials happened under the Bush administration, everybody screamed (as they should have); but when Obama does it, it's suddenly okay. It was wrong when Bush did it and it's wrong when Obama does it.
When you preach openness and transparency, you should be open and transparent.
"The only people who don't want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide." That's what Obama said on August 21, 2010. But the Obama administration has denied more FOIA requests than Bush (whom Obama called the most secretive President in history). When FOIA denials happened under the Bush administration, everybody screamed (as they should have); but when Obama does it, it's suddenly okay. It was wrong when Bush did it and it's wrong when Obama does it.
When you preach openness and transparency, you should be open and transparent.
Quote from Gabfly1:
Why should he? How many presidents before him had to release their academic records? Look at the birther issue. Those meatballs got what they were asking for and it's still not enough. Now the story goes that the CIA was involved in raising the seal or forging signatures or some such. Just because crazies ask for something does not mean that they should necessarily and always be taken seriously. What if a movement formed demanding that each of its members should personally inspect the president's prostate just to make sure he was in sufficiently good health to lead?
Now that I explained it to you, did I really have to explain it to you?