A baby is condemned to death by socialized medicine

its amazing how the left is willing to surrender their rights and others rights even on the most basic life and death things... for what?

I can not even guess why someone would allow a court of a govt to make life and death decision for them them or their family.

Its like big gvot apologists are not even people. they are like dogs happy to surrender their liberty to a govt dog catcher. which I guess would be ok if their fricken politicians didn't want to do the same thing to me.

No... lefty brain dead drones... I get to decide what is right for my children. that is why I live in a country with a constitution. I choose liberty.

If I think my child deserves a shot with specialist I can pay for... who the hell are you... to say no... my child must die without trying.

You would agree there are limits. You shouldn't be able to name your child "fuckface." You shouldn't be allowed to chain your child to a radiator as a disciplinary method.

And since this is now a left vs right. If the right believes the parent knows best, why are they pro-life and not pro-(parent)choice?
 
1. pro life supports the rights of human being to be from ones who would harm it or kill it.
we side with life. especially if you side with late term killings...you side with torture and death... not human rights.

2. pro life of the child would oppose torture by radiator - you would agree.
3. pro life probably would oppose the right to name a baby fuck face. you would agree
4. pro life would support the right of a child to taken by their parents to another medical system if they can afford it.

so the limits are about protecting the child and supporting human rights. killing an unborn child and supporting a govt decision to not allow for alternative treatment is anti human rights and life.
 
1. pro life supports the rights of human being to be from ones who would harm it or kill it.
we side with life. especially if you side with late term killings...you side with torture and death... not human rights.

2. pro life of the child would oppose torture by radiator - you would agree.
3. pro life probably would oppose the right to name a baby fuck face. you would agree
4. pro life would support the right of a child to taken by their parents to another medical system if they can afford it.

so the limits are about protecting the child and supporting human rights. killing an unborn child and supporting a govt decision to not allow for alternative treatment is anti human rights and life.

So you agree the state has a right to overrule a parent with respect their child.

We don't know the details of the expirmental treatment but from what I read it would only solve one of Charlie's many ailments and he was going to be a brain dead vegetable regardless.
 
So you agree the state has a right to overrule a parent with respect their child.
Yes of course. Parents go nuts everyday. And it isn't a nameless State entity making the decision, it is experts whose judgement the State trusts as being far more reliable than that of distraught parents.
 
Leftist idiots. I can't dumb it down any further for you.

European Court Rules Terminal Baby Must Die Despite Parents Willingness to Pay for Other Options.
FAKE NEWS The parents are fee to do as they like but the State is no longer going to keep a brain dead child alive for them.. They will have to do it on their own, with the help of thousands of idiots.
 
FAKE NEWS The parents are fee to do as they like but the State is no longer going to keep a brain dead child alive for them.. They will have to do it on their own, with the help of thousands of idiots.
Piezoe... don't call em idiots.
Maybe you have never walked in their shoes and thats cool. But they're not idiots. They just care. There's a big difference.
 
FAKE NEWS The parents are fee to do as they like but the State is no longer going to keep a brain dead child alive for them.. They will have to do it on their own, with the help of thousands of idiots.
No, the parents were not free to do as they liked. They were not using state funds, you idiot.
 
you are using rhetorical tricks to take the focus off what happened here.

So... I will go to the other extreme... It was state run death panel handing out and enforcing a death sentence rather than letting the parents take their child to the US for treatment.



So you agree the state has a right to overrule a parent with respect their child.

We don't know the details of the expirmental treatment but from what I read it would only solve one of Charlie's many ailments and he was going to be a brain dead vegetable regardless.
 
Back
Top