93.33% Accuracy and Better is Achievable with this Forex Strategy.

IAlwaysWin said:
It's a big calculator so no, those numbers are telling the truth. It's realtime data not historical.
More...

No, it's historical data. Try to get it right. Just out of curiosity, could you define historical data for me in your own words?
 
d08 said:
And not just a little. The cockiness is amusing, as if he's the first guy having a promising backtest in history. He might have something but he'll take some heavy punches in the near future. I only wish for him to keep posting.
More...

Spoke with him in PM a little, tried to get a point across to him. He may get it, he may not. Time will tell.

 
Overnight said:
You simply won't answer the questions with explanations. Numbers are not adding up. That's all it is man.
More...
d08 said:
And not just a little. The cockiness is amusing, as if he's the first guy having a promising backtest in history. He might have something but he'll take some heavy punches in the near future. I only wish for him to keep posting.
More...
You can always depend on old fancy-pants to rain on one's parade. If what I'm doing didn't look interesting to you, you wouldn't be following the thread. I already took heavy punches in the past, I know what I'm doing. I don't need your advise.

I know you have a bone to pick with me and that's okay. I also know you're wishing that I fail but I've already succeeded. This is just the stats to something that I'm already winning at!!
 
IAlwaysWin said:
...

I know you have a bone to pick with me and that's okay. I also know you're wishing that I fail but I've already succeeded. This is just that stats to something that I'm already winning at!!
More...

You're missing one of the points I tried to make in the PM.

If you had truly taken heavy punches in the past, you would not have such a cocky nickname as "IAlwaysWin". Seriously.

When you put your talk to the walk, we shall see. padutrader is one to have gone through the process, and he seems to be finally passing the test of real verses the Matrix. destriero is another one.

I told you, the community is going to repel that aggrandizing of your trading prowess, with no proof.
 
Overnight said:
You're missing one of the points I tried to make in the PM.

If you had truly taken heavy punches in the past, you would not have such a cocky nickname as "IAlwaysWin". Seriously.

When you put your talk to the walk, we shall see. padutrader is one to have gone through the process, and he seems to be finally passing the test of real verses the Matrix. destriero is another one.

I told you, the community is going to repel that aggrandizing of your trading prowess, with no proof.
More...

Shit you're not kidding, @padutrader is killing it.
 
Overnight said:
You're missing one of the points I tried to make in the PM.

If you had truly taken heavy punches in the past, you would not have such a cocky nickname as "IAlwaysWin". Seriously.

When you put your talk to the walk, we shall see. padutrader is one to have gone through the process, and he seems to be finally passing the test of real verses the Matrix. destriero is another one.

I told you, the community is going to repel that aggrandizing of your trading prowess, with no proof.
More...
I don't really need your approval and I already told you what the deal is behind the name (IAlwaysWin.) It's not my fault you guys can't think on a deeper level and figure out what that really means. And, who said I was here to put on a show you clowns?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top