Quote from a_person:
You can't be serious, right? Objecting to certain aspects of your country's foreign policy and murdering 3,000 civilians of another country that has not done anything illegal (yes, the presence of the US troops in SA is in full compliance with international law and bilateral agreements between two countries) are not exactly the same things, are they?
Ron Paul's views is an open season on american civilians, anyone disagreeing with certain aspects of the US foreign (or domestic for that matter) policy, legal and legitimate as it may be will just blow up a few skyscrapers and Ron Paul will declare that "it is our fault".
The US props up and finances the Saudi Royal family, which are autocratic despots. Not exactly a guiltless proposition. Same with Mubarak. As far as Iraq, US Sanctions under Clinton killed over half a million Iraqi children. OBL cited both as justifications for 911.
Let me get this straight. Are you saying the US should be able to finance any dictator and erect crippling sanctions against any Country, and not expect to incite resentment and retribution from militants? Please use you're head. We are all human. Humans all respond the same when attacked or oppressed. That's what blowback is. Retribution.