911 Solved Once and For All

Quote from Teriyaki:

EXCELLENT post Nik - seems like we feel the same way about each other.

But in the end, you nailed it. (giggle)

interesting choice of words... i think ET may have its first spring romance.
 
Awwww, how cute!!!

I guess it was impossible for you to resist two men named Handsome and Fortune, huh? Representing the two things you'll never be :)

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
 
Quote from acronym:



Seriously though, there is little or no rational reason not to have released all available info within 6 months.
They didnt.

Ok, let me 'splain it to ya then...

When the police or the FBI or whoever confiscate a video, etc for an investigation, they don't generally release the footage before any trial. Does this make any shred of sense to you??

Also, after the trial, that police have NO AUTHORITY to release the footage anyways. Want to know why? Because it's not their property, it belongs to the people that owned the video camera, and only THEY can release it. Think Zapruder film here....

NO CONSPIRACY THEORY.....
 
Quote from traderNik:

I guess it was impossible for you to resist two men named Handsome and Fortune, huh? The two things you'll never be :)


yeah, i teach fat kids how to play the tuba.... when i'm not playing lame jazz for disinterested coffee house patrons. i am rolling in the dough. [/sarcasm off]
 
Quote from ratboy88:

yeah, i teach fat kids how to play the tuba.... when i'm not playing lame jazz for disinterested coffee house patrons. i am rolling in the dough. [/sarcasm off]

SHIT!!!

I had included a line in that last post about how I could set my watch by your response, which would be to dis me for the fact that I have played music professionally. Why in the hell did I take it out??!!

Like I have always said, guys like you often become the way they because they see pussy every day and can't get any other than to take it by force. I'm so relaxed and happy because I got more pussy out on the road before I was twenty than you will ever get in your life.

Don't you just hate it when someone posts something about you that hits so close to home? :) :)

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

By the way, I see you don't have it in you to come out and say that Haroki is a paid Government employee whose job it is to go onto discussion boards and refute 9/11 conspiracy theories. Like I said, there may be hope for you yet. Maybe you can be rehabilitated!!
 
Ratgirl... how's that high-IQ groupie thing going? Have you been emailing Mensa members, and standing outside the windows of meetings peering in with a plaintive look on your face? Found any other high IQ people whose pictures you masturbate to when your parents hit the hay?

I would bet anything that you took the Mensa test and failed miserably.
 
Oh, thats about as funny as cot death.

When tradernik &karaoke have finished their back slapping session, perhaps you might explain how it could be i never ascribed to any particular conspiracy theory, supported the conceptual idea of the war on islam(ic terrorism) and somehow managed to decry all efforts at a bureaucratic solution to domestic &international "law enforcement" issues, whilst simultaneously providing legitimate , cost effective solutions to said problems, disliking bushism, fundamentalism, corporate cronyism, right wing apologists, and trolls.
Thats not a bad effort.


I voted the magic 8-ball as the obvious solution to the topic dilemma, so if you two have had a tiff, dont take it out on me.
Its possible im the most unsuccesfull person on the planet, this is true, so perhaps its fortunate im extrordinarily good looking.




:cool:
 
Quote from traderNik:

It's good to see that the moderators removed the death threats from this thread. It's not surprising that these individuals would threaten to kill someone who doesn't agree with this or that opinion that they hold. These death threats by fortune are pretty pathetic but there's always that chance that we are dealing with one of the zealots who is willing to kill those who disagree with him.

i didn't see the threats but i will condemn them anyways. there is no place for any type of threats of violence on here. (except against pabst. :eek: .. just kidding)
 
Quote from Haroki:

Ok, let me 'splain it to ya then...

When the police or the FBI or whoever confiscate a video, etc for an investigation, they don't generally release the footage before any trial. Does this make any shred of sense to you??

Also, after the trial, that police have NO AUTHORITY to release the footage anyways. Want to know why? Because it's not their property, it belongs to the people that owned the video camera, and only THEY can release it. Think Zapruder film here....

NO CONSPIRACY THEORY.....

*Ahem*
I never said there was a legitimate conspiracy theory, apart from blazing incompetence and inherent corruption.

There was never any trial, was there?
Funny about that.

*ahem*, the people who owned the rights were the US government.
True. security, covering the pentagon?
Airport security? Gosh, coulda fooled me, agencies at the time, or the federal government, most certainly did, and do have full rights, should they want it, to said "things".

Oops, i actually meant "the people" own those things, gov being representative of the people, and subject to plebiscite etc.(cough, choke)

Police? Of course they have no authority to do that.
Their all marvellous and wonderfull human beings, who never lie & do a tough job, and would never dream of thinking they had that kind of authority.
 
Quote from WT7 ???:

I saw this thread and just had to join the discussion, what none of the people here like this Haroki character are even asking is how in the world did WTC 7, which was not hit by hijacked planes, collapsed in 6.6 seconds, just .6 of a second longer than it would take an object dropped from the roof to hit the ground. Where is the delay that must be expected due to conservation of momentum, one of the foundational laws of physics? That is, as upper-falling floors strike lower floors—and intact steel support columns—the fall must be significantly impeded by the impacted mass.

NO ONE can change the laws of physics
moonbat or stupid bat


The archives are filled with precisely such discussion, extensive and suprisingly thorough, at that.

Haroki has made some solid points, particularly re; structural damage of such a structure, over time, certainly not just the pancake concept, but in fact the legitimate structural fallibillity of WTC7.

They were made of waffles, and were bound to collapse:)
 
Back
Top